 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
05-20-2015, 01:30 PM
|
||||
|
||||
That's a good point, Peter.
Here's a MINT 9 copy of that variation with the "missing pixel" clearly shown and, as you said, it's non-existent on the Goodwin card...  And here's an example of a card with the marks on the holder being magnified by the Goodwin scan (this is the scan from the Goodwin page and I remember confirming with Bill that the white marks were not on the actual card) 
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| I get suspicious when... | mintacular | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 6 | 09-10-2011 09:54 PM |
| suspicious ebay item | shaunsteig | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 10-04-2010 07:32 AM |
| Suspicious eBay seller | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 03-19-2008 01:09 PM |
| Suspicious ....?? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 07-30-2004 09:21 AM |
| Hmmm...suspicious | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 03-15-2002 08:30 PM |
Hybrid Mode
