 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7
04-29-2015, 07:09 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Also, PSA doesn't tell you the subgrades of what each aspect graded (corners, edges, centering, surface/creases, registration, etc).
BGS will tell you the grades of each of those components, and their normal rule of thumb is not to give a grade higher than +1 of the lowest component score. They don't put this on their Vintage cases, though, and their dividing line is 1980. Here's an example:  1981 Kellogg's 3-D Super Stars #5 - Mike Schmidt [BVG*9] Courtesy of COMC.com If the surface was a 4 instead of 9, the highest this card could get graded is probably a 5.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| T-206 and SGC grading questions | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 09-07-2007 05:52 AM |
| Grading Questions | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 12-16-2005 09:40 AM |
| Some specific grading questions | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 11-17-2005 03:12 PM |
| Those with Questions about PSA grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 05-26-2005 02:05 PM |
| SGC grading questions | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 01-27-2005 08:44 AM |
Threaded Mode