Weirdest PSA 4 (and recently graded nonetheless)

[ezez420]

Actually this was MY card and I got it graded. It was raw and no I dont believe you spoke with me. The marks on the card were more of a wet transfer mark and not an addition. There was no request to not have a qualifier. So squash that theory.

I sold the card and know it has changed hands twice already. For the record, SGC graded this a 1 which was not very accurate which is why it was resubmitted.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

[bobbyw8469]

Originally Posted by ezez420

Actually this was MY card and I got it graded. It was raw and no I dont believe you spoke with me. The marks on the card were more of a wet transfer mark and not an addition. There was no request to not have a qualifier. So squash that theory.

I sold the card and know it has changed hands twice already. For the record, SGC graded this a 1 which was not very accurate which is why it was resubmitted.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

I'm more apt to believe the SGC 1 than the PSA 4. Sorry, but SGC got it right, PSA blew it.

[tschock]

Originally Posted by bobbyw8469

I'm more apt to believe the SGC 1 than the PSA 4. Sorry, but SGC got it right, PSA blew it.

+1. There are marks and there are MARKS. This one is a MARK.

[Leon]

Originally Posted by tschock

+1. There are marks and there are MARKS. This one is a MARK.

Agreed. Card shouldn't be in a 4 holder. It hurts other 4s like the one below it. SGC was closer than PSA but I might give it a 1.5 (on a good day). To me, a 4 is laughable. And that bottom left corner should make it where it would never get a 6, mark or no mark. I don't think its miss cut.