Need help re: T206

[1952boyntoncollector]

id buy that for a dollar

[Runscott]

Just out of curiosity, compare the size of the ad to another one. If this one is smaller, it's probably from an early 1960's reprint set that was actually done fairly well other than the black front printing.

[drcy]

You can see the reproduction dot pattern throughout the entire player image.

[Runscott]

Originally Posted by drcy

You can see the reproduction dot pattern throughout the entire player image.

I'm not sure that's what we are seeing - it would be more consistent, but some areas of the scan are smooth. Doesn't mean dots aren't there, but I think it's just a low-res bad scan. Fake regardless.

[cammb]

Thanks for the info.

[Bpm0014]

Fake as f. Not even worth $1. Haha

[Cozumeleno]

Does the back bottom look like it's been altered (erased, etc.) or is it just my eyes playing tricks on me?

[Sean]

Originally Posted by Cozumeleno

Does the back bottom look like it's been altered (erased, etc.) or is it just my eyes playing tricks on me?

I can't be certain, but it appears whiter than the rest of the card, so maybe something was removed. Like the word REPRINT.

[Cozumeleno]

Originally Posted by Sean

I can't be certain, but it appears whiter than the rest of the card, so maybe something was removed. Like the word REPRINT.

Yeah, that was my thought, too. Looks like a slightly different color than the rest of the back to me.