Should ESPN Magazine have done a better job

[camlov2]

Does anyone have pictures of the four actual rings that should have been used if it was an accurate picture? It is my guess that their fake rings make it much easier to tell the team/year then the real ones at a glance.

[sports-rings]

Originally Posted by camlov2

Does anyone have pictures of the four actual rings that should have been used if it was an accurate picture? It is my guess that their fake rings make it much easier to tell the team/year then the real ones at a glance.

Imagine a cover with these four lookers instead!

[bn2cardz]

Originally Posted by sports-rings

Imagine a cover with these four lookers instead!

Yes those look a lot better, you are absolutely correct.

[thetruthisoutthere]

Originally Posted by bn2cardz

Yes those look a lot better, you are absolutely correct.

Ditto!!!

[camlov2]

Originally Posted by sports-rings

Imagine a cover with these four lookers instead!

I was completely wrong, those rings would have been recognizable at a glance. Only thing is the fakes have added the years.

[ooo-ribay]

Originally Posted by sports-rings

Imagine a cover with these four lookers instead!

Those would have worked (for their purposes) if they brightened the green in the Celtics', the red in the Sox and maybe added a bit of yellow to the Bruins.