 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
03-20-2015, 08:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
One of the cards I asked SGC about when I went to the Shriners a while back was a T206 that I thought was better than the 40 it got. I figured 50, maybe 60 on a good day. I've had it since the early - mid 80's. They pointed out the erased pencil mark that must have been very light to begin with. I'd had it that whole time and never spotted it. so the 40 made sense.
Steve B 
|
|
#2
03-20-2015, 10:03 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I purchased 3 T206 cards with VG fronts, but had pen marks "mostly" erased from the back. I sent them to PSA expected 3-4 MK grades. As the erasure took off some of the back tobacco label ink on each, PSA would only grade "Authentic" as they considered them altered.
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Are These Printers Marks? | dlfallen | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 10-30-2014 12:30 PM |
| Printers marks | Snowbaron | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 12-03-2013 08:04 PM |
| AB 460 Printer's Marks or Something Else? | AndyG09 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 02-07-2012 06:13 PM |
| Pen/Pencil marks | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 12-22-2006 02:38 PM |
| GAI AND PEN MARKS? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 06-05-2005 04:51 PM |
Hybrid Mode
