Sports Daguerrotypes and Ambrotypes

[slidekellyslide]

I think a lot of people on ebay who list their item as a Daguerreotype have never actually seen one. It's very easy to tell one apart from a tintype. I don't believe I've ever seen a sports oriented Dag other than the one reportedly to be Alexander Cartwright and fellow Knickerbockers...but is it really Cartwright???

[drcy]

Dags are unique and easy to identify in person, because they are mirror-like (reflect like a mirror) and the image changes as you change the angle. You can see the normal positive image on a tintype no matter what from what angle you look at it.

There are a few baseball ambrotypes out there.

[barrysloate]

Dags are kind of heavy, as they are photographs on copper plates. Ambros are constructed from two pieces of overlaid glass. Tintypes are photos on a thin piece of metal and are very light. Dags will create a mirror image, and tilted a certain way you can actually see your own reflection. You can't do this with an ambro or tintype.

There are literally hundreds and hundreds of known sports related tintypes, but only a handful of baseball or cricket ambros. As far as dags go, there are none known that definitively picture baseball, although there are a few known of children holding balls.

And dags are by far the most beautiful photographic medium ever created. But they were difficult to make and rather expensive, so they eventually became obsolete.

[GaryPassamonte]

This dag has some problems, but shows a child holding a ball.

[barrysloate]

That's a nice one Gary.

[ramram]

Also...be very careful with the image from a dag. They can be ruined very easily, even by just wiping them. You'll see many dags out there with wipe marks obliterating the image. Dags that are focused and that haven't been over or under exposed can be breathtaking, and very valuable. They can almost look 3-D.

Rob M.

[Runscott]

Originally Posted by ramram

Also...be very careful with the image from a dag. They can be ruined very easily, even by just wiping them. You'll see many dags out there with wipe marks obliterating the image. Dags that are focused and that haven't been over or under exposed can be breathtaking, and very valuable. They can almost look 3-D.

Rob M.

Rob, thanks for that advice. Since I've never held one in hand before, I'm especially amazed by this one and was wondering how to protect it - it doesn't have the 'cover' side of the case. I had no idea as to value, but it was only $25 for an instant relative.

[Runscott]

Originally Posted by barrysloate

Dags are kind of heavy, as they are photographs on copper plates. Ambros are constructed from two pieces of overlaid glass. Tintypes are photos on a thin piece of metal and are very light. Dags will create a mirror image, and tilted a certain way you can actually see your own reflection. You can't do this with an ambro or tintype.

I was at an antique shop a few years ago that had 15-20 ambrotypes. Since I had never seen either an ambrotype or a dag, I didn't immediately know what I was looking at, other than they weren't tintypes. They were priced at $50-100, so I didn't purchase one. Now I need to figure out where I saw them so I can go back and look at them more closely. Nothing special - just pics of couples and individuals - but they were fun to look at.

[ramram]

As with all images, it's still all about the content but I have seen some fairly common looking dags that are worth quite a bit just because of the quality. You would know if you saw one because you stop and say "wow".

Be careful Scott, sounds like you might be catching a new collecting bug!

Rob M.

[Runscott]

Originally Posted by ramram

As with all images, it's still all about the content but I have seen some fairly common looking dags that are worth quite a bit just because of the quality. You would know if you saw one because you stop and say "wow".

Be careful Scott, sounds like you might be catching a new collecting bug!

Rob M.

Definitely not a new collecting bug - I figured I was paying $25 for the privilege of taking it home and carefully studying it. It was cheap enough that I can save it as an example for future reference.

[Beatles Guy]

I think $25 is a great price for that. I've got a few Ambros, no sports content though.