Selling on BST

[ullmandds]

never heard of that "concept" before. usually the first to respond has priority in my opinion.

[Jobu]

I don't think there is a standard, it is really up to the seller.

People often put something like "the first 'I'll take it gets it" which means the first person to say they will buy, scans or not, gets the item. Many people don't do this though, instead doing things as you have or in a different way.

[1952boyntoncollector]

right..it depends....if was 'first ill take it' on the listing that would imply no conditional acceptance.....then to me the sight unseen guy wins. because no conditions..

[packs]

If someone makes an offer I will always negotiate with that person first. But if someone just requests a scan, that to me is not an offer and does not equal intention to buy.

[frankbmd]

My mentor used to say "There's a pecking order around here, and I'm the big pecker."

Substitute seller in the above sentence. You did nothing wrong. I do agree that clarification of the pecking order in the listing could be helpful though for buyers.

[freakhappy]

Originally Posted by packs

If someone makes an offer I will always negotiate with that person first. But if someone just requests a scan, that to me is not an offer and does not equal intention to buy.

I agree with this ^

Usually what I do when requesting a scan is to state that I'm interested, but want to see a pic first...this usually indicates to the seller that I'm serious about it.

I believe that if nothing is indicated in the seller's terms on his thread, then there are no rules and the seller is not obligated to one or the other. But as a buyer I am fully aware that if I am in the middle of talking with the seller, that I could be trumped if I don't commit. Save yourself the headache and think about this going into any transaction.

Just remember to communicate well. For some reason it's a lost art with some sellers around here

[1952boyntoncollector]

Originally Posted by freakhappy

I agree with this ^

Usually what I do when requesting a scan is to state that I'm interested, but want to see a pic first...this usually indicates to the seller that I'm serious about it.

I believe that if nothing is indicated in the seller's terms on his thread, then there are no rules and the seller is not obligated to one or the other. But as a buyer I am fully aware that if I am in the middle of talking with the seller, that I could be trumped if I don't commit. Save yourself the headache and think about this going into any transaction.

Just remember to communicate well. For some reason it's a lost art with some sellers around here

Of course you can just post a scan on the listing as well.....

[freakhappy]

Originally Posted by 1952boyntoncollector

Of course you can just post a scan on the listing as well.....

That would be too easy...

But I respect it if other's do not post a scan and only do so by email

[mybuddyinc]

As said by many above, you can set and follow your own guidelines. There is no right or wrong. However, try to stick to your guidelines.

I go with "I'll take it" trumps ongoing correspondence. At first this may sound harsh, and somewhat unfair. However, I have found, this is the most fair. It is also (once again, I find) the only way to stay organized and sane if selling multiple cards.

Potential buyer #1:

Can I have scans/prices of A, B, C, D, E.

Potential buyer #2:

Can I have scans/prices of B, C, E, F, G

Potential buyer #3:

I'll take A, C, G.


Do I wait for #1 to respond to get back to #2, or 1 and 2 to get back to 3? I could, but what happens if #1 never gets back to me? #2 is on the fence ............etc., etc. etc.................etc., etc. etc.....

Although the grand majority of members do respond in some form or another. There are still some that do not* (or as stated by OP, back out). These are also reasons I go with "I'll take it."

* Not to tell anyone what to do: However, if someone sends you your request, please respond. A "thanks, but no thanks" is sufficient. Even if you think the seller is way off, a "you're nuts" response is better than nothing.


//// end of babble

[iwantitiwinit]

Originally Posted by packs

If someone makes an offer I will always negotiate with that person first. But if someone just requests a scan, that to me is not an offer and does not equal intention to buy.

Agree

[vintagetoppsguy]

Originally Posted by ullmandds

never heard of that "concept" before. usually the first to respond has priority in my opinion.

Peter, you must not use the BST much

Very often I see something like..."A commitment to buy takes precedence over ongoing negotiations"...or something like that.

Edited to add: I do agree with Bryan though - there is no standard - it is up to the seller.

[Prince Hal]

My father always said "No good deed goes unpunished". The "purchaser" of course backed out.