BST transaction gone very bad with "lost" check

[CardboardCollector]

Since the check was mailed, could this be considered mail fraud?

[1963Topps Set]

I believe it could only be mail fraud if the check was intercepted before delivery and cashed by someone else. By the way, I am sorry if I missed this, but how much was the check made out for?

[Rollingstone206]

...

[1952boyntoncollector]

without naming the seller...I really take any complaining with a grain of salt...the seller could defend themselves....easy to just say what the seller did was bad and tell your side of the story if you know there is no chance there will be another version of the story.....by not naming the seller that assures you of that..

[steve_a]

The OP gave enough info for those who really want to find out who the seller is.

[Runscott]

Originally Posted by 1952boyntoncollector

without naming the seller...I really take any complaining with a grain of salt...the seller could defend themselves....easy to just say what the seller did was bad and tell your side of the story if you know there is no chance there will be another version of the story.....by not naming the seller that assures you of that..

This response is moronic, especially the last bit of your single sentence.

[1952boyntoncollector]

Originally Posted by Runscott

This response is moronic, especially the last bit of your single sentence.

well there has been no response....not sure how its moronic if its true........easy to make accusations when no one there to defend them..... plus I said I would take what is said with a grain of salt....not so sure why you would have such a strong reaction to that..i didn't say didn't believe etc..

[Runscott]

Originally Posted by 1952boyntoncollector

well there has been no response....not sure how its moronic if its true........easy to make accusations when no one there to defend them..... plus I said I would take what is said with a grain of salt....not so sure why you would have such a strong reaction to that..i didn't say didn't believe etc..

Okay, it took me 10 seconds to read your first response, deem it 'moronic' and type my response. I apologize for calling your comment 'moronic', as I know you aren't a moron, but this is a serious situation and worthy of a little bit more thought.

Ian has gotten screwed. He has described the situation in detail. The accused knows Ian's handle, as he made the deal here...duh....and how in the world would 'no response' indicate that the accused is '[not] here to defend them'?!? The accused has ignored both Ian AND Leon and now he is ignoring them again. Please - read the posts before jumping in half-cocked. This is a serious situation.