 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14
02-11-2015, 01:48 PM
|
||||
|
||||
if the same type of pen is used, with the same consistent amount of aging/fading from the common stars up to the matty...and if the commons are good, then i'd think the lajoie/jax/matty are also good. who back then would even have a joe jackson examplar to forge from? if they're bad then they're all bad...if they're good then they're all good.
now if it can be proven the photos are period but the ink came much later then the possibility of funny business is greater. like i said with a hoard this big psa probably had all these questions in mind while doing the authentication, you would think. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: SUPER RARE Lou Jackson Autograph w/COA SOLD | quinnsryche | Autographs & Game Used B/S/T | 4 | 02-01-2015 08:21 AM |
| Shoeless Joe Jackson autograph request letter | GrayGhost | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 0 | 07-21-2014 06:45 AM |
| 1915 White Sox Photograph Including Shoeless Joe Jackson?? Rare? Info? | blackmamba | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 2 | 01-30-2011 09:14 AM |
| Shoeless Joe Jackson E90-1 on E Bay | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 11-28-2007 09:09 AM |
| Shoeless Joe Jackson | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 68 | 03-31-2007 06:00 PM |
Threaded Mode