![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Don't disagree with your assessment, there is going to always need to be a group of people "who have to have one AND don't care how it looks" for examples like the one above to continue to grow in value. It's a key card in the hobby no doubt, there are a great number of collectors like myself who could buy one but have no real desire to own it though. Hopefully that sounds less supercilious to you.
__________________
Check out my aging Sell/Trade Album on my Profile page HOF Type Collector + Philly A's, E/M/W cards, M101-6, Exhibits, Postcards, 30's Premiums & HOF Photos "Assembling an unfocused collection for nearly 50 years." Last edited by HRBAKER; 02-06-2015 at 02:45 PM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Worth it in any condition?"
Not to me. Low grade with nice eye appeal will always be worth more than the same grade with less eye appeal. I'd hate to think anyone is spending their rent or 401k money on these low grade copies at, what is currently, the top of the market.
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Matt, I don't think it is an issue of disparaging a marquee card, putting down someone else's spending choices, etc., and I understand that rare may equate to obscure and that high demand may equate to a high price. And I am by no means a condition bug. I really don't care about card condition...to a point. Most of my 'big' cards are lower grades; heck, I won this in the Sterling auction:
![]() My question/observation is that the 1952 Mantle seems to have reached a point where simply having one is more important to some collectors than how it actually looks. The card in question is FUGLY--what we'd all call a filler for any other card--but still pulled in over $3800? I find that incredible for a postwar mainstream issue with thousands of known examples.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Adam, well stated and I can't disagree that such a sum for such a card is really wild and eye catching.
Jack, all good, brother; my poor balls get so busted by work that getting them busted here is a joy and escape in comparison! Just talking cards in any capacity is pleasant on certain days. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yeah but at the end of each day you get to watch that beautiful sunset rest over the Pacific as that cool California breeze blissfully blows around you.......you're still the big winner vs. those whose nose hairs are frozen the moment they walk outside lol.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Amen to that. You just inspired me to shut work down for the day and go jog on the beach. Then I will play even more hookey by blasting some college and high school punks in Call Of Duty.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I wish I was your neighbor......I'd already be over hanging out lol |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wtt 1952 topps mickey mantle sgc auth for same card in slightly better condition | 25801wv | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 11-27-2012 08:49 PM |
(2) 1952 Topps Commons in GD Condition For Sale | Lee17 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 06-13-2012 11:57 PM |
Wts: 1956 topps mantle nm+ condition | CMIZ5290 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 11-29-2011 12:44 PM |
How much do you guys think this 52 Topps Mantle is worth?? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 12-21-2008 09:03 PM |
WANTED: 1952 Topps in really bad condition in order to complete set | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 6 | 04-11-2008 05:04 AM |