4k uhd tv

[jim]

saw that tv also and liked it. but doesn't the program need to be broadcast in UD hdtv also so that new tv can utilize all its power? i do not know but am asking.
jim

[Leon]

Originally Posted by jim

saw that tv also and liked it. but doesn't the program need to be broadcast in UD hdtv also so that new tv can utilize all its power? i do not know but am asking.
jim

Yes but eventually (I think a year or three) it will be no different than HD. And how are those non-HD TVs doing today?

[jim]

when your eyesight is as bad as mine...

[HRBAKER]

Originally Posted by jim

when your eyesight is as bad as mine...

I'm with you, for the cash I can't tell a big enough difference. Sorta like shopping for diamonds.

[Leon]

Originally Posted by HRBAKER

I'm with you, for the cash I can't tell a big enough difference. Sorta like shopping for diamonds.

I agree when it is new HD TV vs a little older HD TV. Unfortunately we have the very first iteration of HD (14-15 yrs old) on an old BIG TV and it is usually a little blurry. If we had a real good, newer HD TV I wouldn't consider it, as I agree. But if we are going to upgrade there isn't a ton of price difference (a few hundred dollars) between the decent and really good HD out today, from what I think I have seen.

[rjackson44]

jesus I just spent 500 for a tv unreal

[Beatles Guy]

I purchased a 65 inch Samsung HDTV with a 240 refresh rate last year for about $1200. We don't have cable, satellite, or even local channels. I love it for watching Blu Ray, Netflix and Hulu though. I also get the MLB.tv package and my neighbor loves it, because he can keep up with the game while he is out having a smoke As for 4K my wife, who is not impressed with TVs, was awed by it. Still a bit pricey for me but in the next couple of years I'll move the Samsung into my man room and get one