![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Wouldn't an agreement not to bid (because you were supposed to pick up the doubles) be like "partnering" in the auction? I see people posting that they'd like to "partner" up on a lot. What's the difference here>
Wouldn't the person that won the lot (and was supposed to sell the dupes) be stiffing the guy that "parnered up" in the auction? Am I missing something here?
__________________
fr3d c0wl3s - always looking for OJs and other 19th century stuff. PM or email me if you have something cool you're looking to find a new home for. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I can't get past the $20,000.00. Or is that hypothetical too.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Is reverse shill bidding a real thing? Never heard of that before. Anyway, I don't think "reverse shill bidding" is any sort of offense. One person chooses not to bid on an item no matter what their intentions are afterwards...nothing stands out as a violation to me. I may be wrong, but I doubt this exact thing doesn't happen too often. I would think, like stated above, that teaming up on an auction is more common...which of course is fine.
__________________
T206's Graded low-mid 219/520 T201's SGC/PSA 2-5 50/50 T202's SGC/PSA 2-5 10/132 1938 Goudey Graded VG range 37/48 |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
What bothers me more is that the OP seems to be protecting the other party...which to me seems worse than actually backing out of a deal somehow. Why? Because, the OP knows not to deal with this person anymore and the rest of us have to take our chances we will not get burned by that person. This, of course, is assuming everything you said is correct.
Just my two cents... Joshua |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Also, if the member is outted, would it really be surprising if there are more incidents with him.
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Excellent Point!
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
How is that different from a hundred other propositions that are proven (or not) every day by examining the evidence and drawing inferences? Someone admitting he would have bid seems like pretty competent evidence to me.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 01-26-2015 at 01:17 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question regarding a hypothetical mail order problem for sellers and PayPal... | Baseball Rarities | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 12-16-2014 04:09 PM |
A hypothetical thought problem | Brianruns10 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 10 | 05-23-2012 09:24 PM |
Heads up- problem with board member Jim Rogers, jrog007 | Leon | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 10-10-2011 10:56 AM |
a major problem | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 139 | 06-08-2007 02:22 PM |
Major problem with eBay - Help is requested! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 06-24-2003 09:17 AM |