![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Leon
The oj spotted tie. Graded 20 (rebacked) |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
wow.....First time I have seen that. I hope it was a mistake but don't think it was. I don't' think I agree with them on this one.....but at least they noted it is rebacked. In my mind it should be AUT.....
ps..I should add, this being said, if it is an attempt at fixing the sepia cards grading criteria that doesn't matter too much, it's a good first attempt. We usually lament the gem photo cards that are graded a 1 or a 2, but with a back flaw, in the context of the ones that resemble a ghost, but with sharp corners, receiving a 5, 6 or 7.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 01-25-2015 at 10:00 AM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Word back from SGC, just now, is that the rebacked card with a numerical grade is a mistake and it's being addressed.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Grading Companies | EvilKing00 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 11-29-2012 08:07 AM |
Grading Companies | Ben Yourg | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 02-04-2010 10:38 AM |
What if grading companies could do this??????? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 11-20-2007 09:17 PM |
What Grading Companies are the Best? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 03-14-2007 01:40 PM |
Grading Companies 1-10 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 11-19-2003 11:37 AM |