Guess the grade and explain why?!

[ullmandds]

Originally Posted by tiger8mush

1 (pd)
1.5 (pd)
2 (pd)
3 (pd)

pd is the only qualifier I can imagine it getting ...

http://www.psacard.com/Services/PSAGradingStandards

now that's just bad etiquette...multiple guesses at once!!! Think outside the box...this is PSA after all.

[bn2cardz]

2 MC. They are assuming the name was cut off.

[t206hound]

Originally Posted by bn2cardz

2 MC. They are assuming the name was cut off.

I'm with ÄñÐ¥. Based on the guesses thus far, they must have given it a MC qualifier (why will always remain a mystery).

[ullmandds]

you guys have suffered long enough...the grade is

PSA 1(MC)

And I agree...how is this card miscut?

[gregr2]

Yay!! I had the 1 right!

[asoriano]

Originally Posted by ullmandds

you guys have suffered long enough...the grade is

PSA 1(MC)

And I agree...how is this card miscut?

[vthobby]

Originally Posted by ullmandds

you guys have suffered long enough...the grade is

PSA 1(MC)

And I agree...how is this card miscut?

You are correct, that is graded a 1 MC but it is definitely not a 1 and it is also not MC.

Maybe we can start a grading company that can slab the slab and put the REAL grade on the outside slab......hmmmmm

I'd say its a (MG).

MG=Misgraded.

Peace, mike

[mrvster]

your not too far off

[ullmandds]

Originally Posted by bn2cardz

2 MC. They are assuming the name was cut off.

cut off from where? the extra fat bottom border????

[bobbyw8469]

I never saw the back so I cant speak for the qualifier without totally seeing the card.

[bn2cardz]

Originally Posted by bobbyw8469

I never saw the back so I cant speak for the qualifier without totally seeing the card.

He posted this in the original thread

http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=191524

[bn2cardz]

Originally Posted by ullmandds

cut off from where? the extra fat bottom border????

Well you asked for a reason and that is the only reason I could come up with. I originally only thought MC because of how quickly you jumped on the first time miscut was brought up, yet never asked any one else to explain their qualifiers

I assume they are saying it is MC because that is the designation that has worked for every other previous "No Name" they got, it just doesn't apply this time.

[ullmandds]

Originally Posted by bn2cardz

Well you asked for a reason and that is the only reason I could come up with. I originally only thought MC because of how quickly you jumped on the first time miscut was brought up, yet never asked any one else to explain their qualifiers

I assume they are saying it is MC because that is the designation that has worked for every other previous "No Name" they got, it just doesn't apply this time.

yes Andy...after I responded to your guess I thought I was giving it away!!!!

Has nothing to do with the back...which there is a scan of in an older t206 w/no name thread.

[mrvster]

this is a toughie....

[mrvster]

AT FIRST.....Chris asked me, I told him not to bid....

problem- nnof are not recognized anymore

[mrvster]

true "no names" have become not "politically" correct......anymore....why???

NO ONE HAS THE NUTS TO GRADE THEM!!

there....I said it!

[mrvster]

they are too hard to discern apparently......too many forgers/ erasures...

Pete.....the problem with your name is the "brown" layer associated with the caption....there is no "jump"

off the bottom....

these , I wish, were better ways to determine a true "no name"


this "could've" been a miscut with a "low" struck" caption, but there is no "brown" layer "jump"....but that doesn't explain it entirely....

I own both printer's scrap "true" no names" and a factory cut "caption" jump...

very confusing....

[Rich Klein]

You realize since we are supposed to deduct 2 grades for a MK your PSA 1 MK translates to a -1

So you can send me the card since it is not officially not even gradable

[Sophiedog]

How is the card miscut? It's almost dead on centered

[mrvster]

its called a cop out on the part of PSA

[mrvster]

almost willing to bet a lot of money PSA will not slab it nor will SGC

[dog*dirt]

Not able to grade. Altered stock?

[tiger8mush]

Originally Posted by ullmandds

Think outside the box...this is PSA after all.

So it got an OF (out of focus) qualifier? Phillippe's name is actually there, its just so out of focus you can't see it

[bnorth]

2.5 (PD) my guess but wouldn't doupt the old AUTHENTIC N-O