![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If that's a surface wrinkle on the front, I'd say a 2? Assuming they deemed it authentic.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If there is no paper loss it came back at 2.5
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm going with Authentic
__________________
My website with current cards http://syckscards.weebly.com Always looking for 1938 Goudey's |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Looks VG to me as long as back is ok
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
back is fine...that IS a surface wrinkle vertically on lower front.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Looks like a 1.5 to me with the miscut, crease, and corner wear.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Packs...I am not a student of the nuances of grading...why do you say this is miscut?
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I can't tell if it's off center or miscut from the scan. The tiny top border and huge bottom border say miscut to me. It also looks like the bottom border has an angle to it.
Last edited by packs; 01-22-2015 at 07:34 AM. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Corner wear and crease, my guess is 1.
__________________
Numerous successful transactions on Net54, just ask for references. https://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/gregr2 |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
2
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Trimmed?
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Does PSA label cards "missing color" the way SGC does?
PSA 3 color variation Last edited by slipk1068; 01-22-2015 at 10:16 AM. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Authentic because PSA indicates someone altered the card by removing the name text.
2 because of the rounded corners and small surface crease. Cool card.
__________________
fr3d c0wl3s - always looking for OJs and other 19th century stuff. PM or email me if you have something cool you're looking to find a new home for. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would say a 2. Corners and wrinkle being the reason. I have certainly seen worse 2's, but that would be my guess.
Tom C |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
PSA 1.5 (I think I see a verticle crease in the bottom middle that goes about half way up the card).
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I say 2.0. My question is whether they added "No name on front" or something similar to the flip. My guess is that PSA wouldn't have done that though I have seen it on a SGC flip.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd go with 1.5 - the crease/wrinkle looks fairly large to me, centering, rounded corners. For me, that makes it 'Fair'.
Last edited by Cozumeleno; 01-22-2015 at 07:51 AM. |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
keep em coming...no one is correct yet.
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Does the card have a qualifier of some sort?
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oh, wait. You said PSA graded it. Then I'm changing my guess to a 3 thinking they missed that big crease.
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Guess the grade? | KCRfan1 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 05-15-2013 07:03 AM |
Yet another guess the grade ... | frohme | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 04-26-2013 06:02 PM |
Guess The Grade ? | Qcards | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 27 | 04-16-2013 08:03 AM |
Guess my grade game | t206hound | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 05-03-2011 06:25 AM |
Guess my grade. Grade revealed!! | Pup6913 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 43 | 11-18-2009 07:59 PM |