condition

[jchcollins]

Hi Robert,

I was actually looking for a thread like this. I'm getting back into collecting older cards (starting with the 1955 and '56 Topps sets I've always wanted to complete but never did...) now in my late 30's after at least a decade off from the hobby.

I've been there with the high-end, graded card hoopla - trust me. You get to the point where you really lose sight of the card as a whole and are only worrying about a grade on a case, or worse - fretting about only one corner on one card, or something equally ridiculous. I found myself up in the middle of the night looking at cards under a magnifying glass - really? Was my BVG 7 '56 Koufax better than the PSA 6 Koufax? At some point the hobby just got so frustrating to me at every turn that I kind of just put it aside. Since then I've gone back to school and had a family and realized that life is too short...

When I was a kid, the fact that a card was simply "old" was cool enough. If it was a card of a superstar that was all the better - and when I collected these types of vintage cards as a kid in back in the 1980's and early 90's - I was for sure not worried about some dinged corners or an occasional crease or other small flaw. Some of the most cherished cards that I recall having as a kid back then had some pretty serious issues from the PSA perspective. But when I look back now, that time period was when I had the most fun with collecting - hands down.

I'm hoping that getting back into collecting now with the ability to take things a bit less seriously will payoff. You are right, you can still get very presentable cards with a ton of eye appeal in the VG range - and for a fraction of what those who are participating in the high-end market wind up dishing out.

Good luck and long live those less than perfect cards!

[almostdone]

Just a suggestion but you say you have a handful of higher graded cards you might sell to get some cash to purchase lower condition cards. One of the things I loved as a kid and try to do now as an adult is trade cards. I remember trading away a 1978 Nolan Ryan card for a Ed Ott card because his name sounded cooler to me. Dumb trade but great memory.

See if you can find someone looking for high grade and would be willing you trade a stack of lower grade for it. Put something on the BST and give it a try. If no one bites nothing list but maybe you would come up with something great fir birth parties and all you paid for was shipping.

I have made a few trades on the boards and done very well. Great way to interact with collectors as well without always feeling like a business transaction.

Just a thought,
Drew

[vintagebaseballcardguy]

Originally Posted by almostdone

Just a suggestion but you say you have a handful of higher graded cards you might sell to get some cash to purchase lower condition cards. One of the things I loved as a kid and try to do now as an adult is trade cards. I remember trading away a 1978 Nolan Ryan card for a Ed Ott card because his name sounded cooler to me. Dumb trade but great memory.

See if you can find someone looking for high grade and would be willing you trade a stack of lower grade for it. Put something on the BST and give it a try. If no one bites nothing list but maybe you would come up with something great fir birth parties and all you paid for was shipping.

I have made a few trades on the boards and done very well. Great way to interact with collectors as well without always feeling like a business transaction.

Just a thought,
Drew

Thanks, Drew. I have thought about that as a possibility. I guess I will see what develops.

[vintage954]

I mostly collect EX-EXMT unless is pre-1948. I might spend more money in the long run but for me it is worth the wait. I collect for myself and not investment so like many others have said, when I die my kid and my brother get my collection.

[LeftHandedDane]

Like many of the other posters, I actually prefer cards in the VGEX range (+/-). I don't care about corners, but avoid cards with creases, writing, paper loss, etc on the front (I also dont care what the back looks like). My standards go down the older the card - for example I think the 39/40 Play Balls look better with rounded corners and some yellowing!

I also prefer raw cards to slabbed, unless I am buying higher priced cards where I am worried about fakes. Even trimming does not bother me unless it is super obvious, as long as I am not getting ripped off by paying top dollar for something that has been trimmed.

Frankly, I never really could justify paying 3, 5 or even 10x as much for a highly graded card than the VGEX one, and would much rather spend the money to get more cards!

[Exhibitman]

I liquidated nearly all of my PSA 6 and better slabs and replaced them with presentable lesser cards, mostly raw.

[jchcollins]

Originally Posted by LeftHandedDane

Like many of the other posters, I actually prefer cards in the VGEX range (+/-). I don't care about corners, but avoid cards with creases, writing, paper loss, etc on the front (I also dont care what the back looks like). My standards go down the older the card - for example I think the 39/40 Play Balls look better with rounded corners and some yellowing!

I also prefer raw cards to slabbed, unless I am buying higher priced cards where I am worried about fakes. Even trimming does not bother me unless it is super obvious, as long as I am not getting ripped off by paying top dollar for something that has been trimmed.

Frankly, I never really could justify paying 3, 5 or even 10x as much for a highly graded card than the VGEX one, and would much rather spend the money to get more cards!

Good explanation - It comes down to personal preferences. For me (and it must be said this is mostly for stars and HOFers - I'm less picky with common cards) it is all about the eye appeal. Corner damage if not extreme normally does not bother me. I don't like cards that are badly off-centered, but minor creasing - what I used to call "spider" creases or wrinkling does not bother me either so long as it doesn't detract from the eye-appeal of the card. I have a '56 Topps Ted Williams obtained as a kid which has this type of creasing in one small place off to the side, but otherwise looks great. Out of morbid curiosity about a decade ago (and because I had some other cards I wanted to get graded to sell) I shipped it off to SGC, and it came back a 40, VG-3. When I think of all the pleasure I got out of that card as a kid - I mean it was a real museum piece next to my friends and all of their Jose Canseco rookie cards - I don't think I'd trade it for a PSA 6 today.

[JollyElm]

I'm upgrading (I should have said TRYING to upgrade) all of my sets from 1957 to 1972, so these days I am definitely looking for cards in nicer shape. But I have to address something that people keep on saying. Collecting for personal enjoyment or collecting for 'investment' are in no way mutually exclusive. You don't have to choose one approach or the other. I collect because I frickin' love it…but I also want to be sure that if I'm forced to sell off everything one day that I'll get a decent penny in return for it all. It always lingers (at least a little bit) somewhere in the back of my mind. I'm sure most collectors have the selfsame (love that word!!) mindset.

[vintagebaseballcardguy]

Originally Posted by jchcollins

Hi Robert,

I was actually looking for a thread like this. I'm getting back into collecting older cards (starting with the 1955 and '56 Topps sets I've always wanted to complete but never did...) now in my late 30's after at least a decade off from the hobby.

I've been there with the high-end, graded card hoopla - trust me. You get to the point where you really lose sight of the card as a whole and are only worrying about a grade on a case, or worse - fretting about only one corner on one card, or something equally ridiculous. I found myself up in the middle of the night looking at cards under a magnifying glass - really? Was my BVG 7 '56 Koufax better than the PSA 6 Koufax? At some point the hobby just got so frustrating to me at every turn that I kind of just put it aside. Since then I've gone back to school and had a family and realized that life is too short...

When I was a kid, the fact that a card was simply "old" was cool enough. If it was a card of a superstar that was all the better - and when I collected these types of vintage cards as a kid in back in the 1980's and early 90's - I was for sure not worried about some dinged corners or an occasional crease or other small flaw. Some of the most cherished cards that I recall having as a kid back then had some pretty serious issues from the PSA perspective. But when I look back now, that time period was when I had the most fun with collecting - hands down.

I'm hoping that getting back into collecting now with the ability to take things a bit less seriously will payoff. You are right, you can still get very presentable cards with a ton of eye appeal in the VG range - and for a fraction of what those who are participating in the high-end market wind up dishing out.

Good luck and long live those less than perfect cards!

You summed up a lot of my thoughts quite well. Thanks for the insight. It is somehow comforting to know that I am not alone.

[jchcollins]

Originally Posted by vintagebaseballcardguy

You summed up a lot of my thoughts quite well. Thanks for the insight. It is somehow comforting to know that I am not alone.

You're welcome. If it makes you feel any better, I still fight the urge to occasionally splurge on a high-grade card that I don't need (or more accurately cannot afford...) but sooner or later I usually pull out of the clouds. I guess when I was single and just worried about myself that was one thing - but anymore I'm unhappy with myself in the long run if I know I've spent more on a card than I should have. It happens to us a lot of us from time to time, I guess.

I'd like to think that especially for set collectors - more people would do a better job of emphasizing the collectability of VG range cards. Think about it: These are small pieces of cardboard that were issued in wax wrappers with chewing gum to children - in many cases 50 or more years ago. And today we somehow think they aren't good unless they are close to perfect on a 10 point scale? That flies in the face of what is rational when it comes to what collecting is supposed to be about - in my humble opinion anyway...

-John