![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am contemplating this....pre rookies....extended rookies....rookies.
I had not realized that this area of the hobby was as complicated as deciding what is and is not a variation :-0 At least for Topps and Fleer I think I am ok, however it comes out, since I have all their sets ![]() Last edited by ALR-bishop; 01-09-2015 at 07:53 AM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The pre-rookie is still a rookie than the player's first appearance in a Topps Donruss or Fleer would be considered their first card appearance not a rookie card for those sets
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm with you on the '88s, I would consider them the RC. I hated the whole "XRC" thing. Wasn't that something that Beckett created?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was only half kidding about the variations analogy. There is no one accepted hobby definition of a variation. I assume the same is true for "rookie card". Just many view points.
I realize prices for the newly inducted folks may be in a state of flux at this point, but of the cards mentioned for these players does one or the other(s) carry a premium over it's "competitors" in the hobby currently ? Last edited by ALR-bishop; 01-09-2015 at 08:16 AM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
When the rookie card craze became big in the mid-1980's, dealers were looking for a way to make as many cards as possible qualify as "rookie cards" hence the XRC, RC, PRC, etc. It's all about making more money, just like almost everything else in the world these days...........
Last edited by bcbgcbrcb; 01-09-2015 at 10:32 AM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Agreed, but would not prices indicate how the hobby as a whole leans as to any particular player
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You're right about that Al. The collectors will dictate what price a collector is willing to pay for each version, RC, XRC, PRC, etc. The higher prices, of course, will indicate which card is the favorite of collectors.
One other note related to the '80's rookie card craze, it went so far as having a player's first card issued by each individual card company labeled in the price guides as well. For example, Topps first issued a card of Joe Carter in 1985, however he appeared in the 1984 Donruss set. Of course, the Donruss card was his rookie card so the '85 Topps was labeled FTC or First Topps Card. The dealers tried to charge higher prices for those designated cards as well........ Last edited by bcbgcbrcb; 01-09-2015 at 12:08 PM. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I've wrestled with the rookie card defns as well, and have settled on the "First XYZ Card" rather than "Rookie Card." "XYC" can mean anything, such as the first Topps card, or minor league card, or first appearance in your favorite team's uniform, etc. This has been quite liberating for me, as now it is less confusing and can often be answered quite clearly. As primarily a Cleveland Indians collector, it has been quite useful for me to identify the First Cleveland Card of players rather than get into a debate about their rookie cards. As an example, Joe Charboneau's First Cleveland Card is unequivocally from the 1980 Cleveland Indians Team Issue Photocards set. If I limited myself to pondering what his rookie card is, there would be endless debate about which contender from the 1981 Topps, Fleer, Donruss, OPC, Kellogg's, Drake's, Squirt, or All-Star Program sets of that year is perhaps more legitimate. I get to avoid all the nonsense using "just the facts," and answer the question we are all trying to answer anyways.
One challenge I have encountered, though, is that many cards are truly hard to date, including JD McCarthy PCs, certain Team Issue PCs, Exhibit Cards, etc. As more hobby info becomes available, though, more and more of these sets and specific cards from these sets will be dated as well.
__________________
Jason |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
In the 80s when everyone was collecting, it made sense to have xrc, rc, ftc. However now that that stuff has cooled off, the only thing that makes sense is rc for the first Topps, Donruss, or Fleer card of the player. The supply on these cards far exceeds the demand.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm with you, Adam. I also chose to go after first card, whether it was regional, team issue, minor league, etc. Presents some pretty good challenges when you get to Rickey Henderson, Cal Ripken, Ryne Sandberg, Jim Rice, Mike Schmidt, etc. I basically did the same thing with the pre-war guys as well.
Last edited by bcbgcbrcb; 01-10-2015 at 10:33 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: Jeter Auto Rookie Card & PSA 7 Jeter 1993 SP Rookie card. | Wolfgang427 | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 1 | 10-17-2014 05:20 PM |
Pete Rose Rookie Card Centering Question | deken | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 1 | 01-18-2013 12:07 AM |
My new autograph classification scheme! | David Atkatz | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 3 | 01-02-2011 08:16 PM |
GAI dropping the "authentic" grading classification | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 01-23-2005 08:31 AM |
BOB LEMKE - Opinion...card classification... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 11-09-2002 03:49 PM |