![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would grade them if you're going to keep them because, like Jay said, they look sharp in the PSA holder. But if you are going to sell them, you may actually lose money on some because the cost of grading equals what some of the non-stars sell for. But personally I love this set. I think they're a neat piece of history.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would think grading the HOFs, assuming they will get very high grades, will be worth it, the other players probably not.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
great looking pins.
with Jay W, I think the PSA slab would be a great fit for them. all the best, barry |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thank you for the replies, its good to get confirmation of what I was just guessing about. Grading the HOF'ers etc. would seem to be the logical way to go if sending them in, my dilemma does come with the less valuable pins. The value on this issue is nominal in comparison to most "set/series" issued items of the era, so I wondered if there would be those who preferred them loose.
To me they seem to be treated like a hybrid of cards and memorabilia. I would think the card side would want the slab to coordinate/incorporate in with their graded cards and the memorabilia side would want something they can hold and display without a computer flip twice the size of the object. I wanted to see if anyone else thought this way. I'm guessing the white paper backs are the second production run of these? I would have to look again, but I think all the large letter variations in the group have white. I've never given these much thought before because they are "just P2 pins", but having a stash of really nice ones like these has me appreciating them more. GB Last edited by boneheadandrube; 01-06-2015 at 12:08 PM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Greg, here are mine. I like the old PSA holder. Does anyone know how much they charge to grade a pin?
__________________
What I collect: 1909-11 e254 Colgan’s Chips 49/226 1910-12 P2 Sweat Caporal PSA Pins 140/204 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Joe, for some reason I like the new holder better, it seems to make the pin look like it's "locked" in and seems to highlight it more. The one thing that I don't like about this set are the large letter variations. Those pins look generic to me.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm a pin guy, and I prefer mine unslabbed. Much better for display, IMO. But to sell, as I said, I think grading the HOFs would be worth it. Just tried to upload a picture of my pin display, but the upload failed, I have no idea why. It's just an ordinary jpeg from my camera, I can send in emails no problem.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Anyone with an SGC vs. PSA preference looking to trade? | ajjohnsonsoxfan | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 07-02-2014 05:20 PM |
1915 CJ's... Am I Alone On This Preference? | MattyC | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 35 | 10-05-2013 02:54 AM |
Graded Cards - Preference? | John V | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 8 | 03-06-2011 06:30 PM |
Low grade preference | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 10-08-2005 01:47 PM |
eBay # of days preference? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 02-05-2005 05:20 PM |