![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
cards where i thought PSA was insane, every time i have cracked them out i have eventually found the st. I am pretty sure it is there you are just missing it. Sometimes the wax on the front is hard to see except in the proper lighting.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I have never understood how factory made flaws have been used to down grade how much the item looks compared to the day it came from the factory. I understand people don't like OC cards, but that to me is not a condition that has anything to do with whether it is "mint" or not. I do understand that this has been part of the criteria for a very long time, but I have no idea when it started and why. I will admit I am one of the few that likes qualifiers for condition issues caused in production (I don't like MK or ST). I believe the perfect grading company would give a production grade and post factory grade.
__________________
https://www.flickr.com/photos/bn2cardz/albums |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
BST Pet Peeve | Minerscoin | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 08-05-2009 05:48 AM |
B/S/T pet peeve | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 05-17-2006 08:58 PM |
PSA Question re: "MK" Qualified | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 03-24-2006 10:37 AM |
' Pet Peeve | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 11-07-2003 04:24 PM |
pet peeve | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 09-14-2003 04:26 PM |