|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
"Sage advice, David . . . I mean the first post."
But, seriously, an obvious technique is have the buyer pay with check or money order on expensive orders, use the UPS-type shipping method I described or come up with your own personal method of documenting what you shipped (witness, filming, other). "In between your fits of idiocy, David, you sometimes say intelligent things." "Thank you. I have my lucid moments . . . Actually, I have an BFA and it's called collage." "You're not supposed to say 'actually.'" "Whatever." Last edited by drcy; 12-16-2014 at 01:40 PM. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
When a high dollar item has been returned because of it being not as described, I have heard of sellers actually opening the returned item at the postal counter in front of a post office employee, while getting the event on video. I suppose the same could be done when mailing an item. Even that isn't airtight, but it could certainly help you argue your case. I suppose you have to be paranoid if it is a high dollar item.
__________________
Always looking for: 1913 Cravats pennants St. Paul Saints Game Used Bats and Memorabilia http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=180664 |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Doesn't insurance cover you on this sort of thing? e.g-if the buyer claims he received 'junk wax' instead of the item, can't you file an insurance claim based on the fact that the item was stolen? Certainly that fits the definition of 'stolen'.
Let the insurance's fraud area go after the thief.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Don't think that would work though. Insurance would say the same thing: how do we know you mailed the item you claim to have mailed?
Last edited by packs; 12-16-2014 at 02:37 PM. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
If that's the case, then insurance is totally worthless and no one should ever purchase it. I believe that if you know their has been theft, and you report it to the police, you are covered.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Seems strange to me, but okay.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ Last edited by Runscott; 12-16-2014 at 03:09 PM. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
I believe the insurqnce he had was through ebay labels and shipcover. I also am fairly certain it was only insured up to their limit and perhaps not the full amount. He did not get paid out on the claim, and it may have been because of the signature confirmation not happening and just being blank when they tried to verify it, through no fault of his own.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
The USPS has to prove mail fraud, not assume without evidence it happened and not pay. If the latter was the case, the fraud would be that they charge for insurance.
Last edited by drcy; 12-16-2014 at 03:32 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| OT: A Taxing problem for card sellers | Runscott | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 05-01-2014 11:25 AM |
| VCP Mail problem | BobbyVCP | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 04-10-2014 03:24 PM |
| O/T usps mail problem need help!!! | sportscollector | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 04-26-2013 08:58 AM |
| A hypothetical thought problem | Brianruns10 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 10 | 05-23-2012 10:24 PM |
| Anyone ever had this problem with delivery confirmation and Paypal? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 06-15-2008 02:29 PM |