FS 1952 Topps Jackie Robinson

[Peter_Spaeth]

Here is what the card looked like a few months ago when it sold, presumably to Jacob, for 1755. What a difference a scan makes.

[1952boyntoncollector]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Here is what the card looked like a few months ago when it sold, presumably to Jacob, for 1755. What a difference a scan makes.

i didnt buy the card for 1755...i 100% bought it off ebay...FYI....

[Peter_Spaeth]

OK fair enough my bad but my point was it sold in June for 900 less than it just sold for. Markets don't change that fast. SAME exact card.

[Sean1125]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

OK fair enough my bad but my point was it sold in June for 900 less than it just sold for. Markets don't change that fast. SAME exact card.

I disagree. I have made flips in less than a week for many factors more than the discussed sale on cards I thought I had paid too strong on.

[Peter_Spaeth]

On a readily available non rookie non Mantle/Ruth card in midgrade?

[calvindog]

......with numerous print defects ....... .. ..... .. .. ...

[calvindog]

.... Fyi .... .. .. .

[Sean1125]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

On a readily available non rookie non Mantle/Ruth card in midgrade?

Could you find me a centered 52 Jackie, please?

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by Sean1125

Could you find me a centered 52 Jackie, please?

That took five seconds.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/1952-Topps-3...item4875267810

and

http://www.ebay.com/itm/1952-TOPPS-3...3D161502394389

[BlueBlood]

Originally Posted by Sean1125

I disagree. I have made flips in less than a week for many factors more than the discussed sale on cards I thought I had paid too strong on.

Probably a flip that you low balled on..Since you are a "dealer"

Den.nis Sch.err

[Sean1125]

Originally Posted by BlueBlood

Probably a flip that you low balled on..Since you are a "dealer"

Hi, the rules require if you are going to make opinionated posts that your first and last name are visible.

Thanks.

Also, the specific flip I am talking to is a 52 Mantle that was purchased from Mile High and sold 6 days later.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by Sean1125

Hi, the rules require if you are going to make opinionated posts that your first and last name are visible.

Thanks.

Also, the specific flip I am talking to is a 52 Mantle that was purchased from Mile High and sold 6 days later.

Sean as you know very well, a 52 Mantle is a little different than a midgrade fifth year (yes, I know, first Topps) Jackie Robinson in terms of whether you might be able to hit it big with a quick flip. You're comparing apples and peanuts.

[Mikehealer]

Originally Posted by Sean1125

I disagree. I have made flips in less than a week for many factors more than the discussed sale on cards I thought I had paid too strong on.

That statement should help you obtain you some new inventory.

[1952boyntoncollector]

i would take a High Number Rice print defect if centered....there are certain high number 1952 Topps where less than 10% of the population is decently centered..including the Jackie... especially in the psa 5 range..

[KC Doughboy]

I'd just like to say, Congratulations on the sale and glad to see you got top dollar.
As a collector who regularly sells my duplicate cards, I'm pleased whenever I see sales prices going up and record prices realized.
Lastly, I it disappoints me to see this site allowing member(s) to personally attack another member and nothing is done to stop/delete it. Hopefully it's just a case of the owner/moderator not seeing it.