![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A couple of '56 overprints...
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Nice cards Tom and welcome to the forum.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks, I have so much to share!
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I do like it. Can you tell if the Woodling has the lower border break, which would make it a print defect within a print defect
![]() |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Looks like ole Donnie and his ears met a couple of heavily lipsticked ladies the night before.
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The 1980 Topps Greg Pryor "no name" now has a cohort, 1980 Topps Doug Bair. I tried to show a 1980 Topps uncut A* sheet with Greg Pryor and Doug Bair on the top row, but I am unable to download it here. The Pryor is the first card on the top row, the Bair is the sixth card. My theory is that like the other 1980 Topps sheets that had the top row missing red ink and leaving names in yellow, this sheet ran out of blue ink but left almost no name rather than just a yellow name. Mike LaCoss is the eighth card on the row, so there should be a nameless 1980 Topps Mike LaCoss out there somewhere.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Cliff, does the Fred Stanley card appear on the same row as the Bair and Pryor?
Also, in an attempt to keep Richard busy (updating his variation list), I found this 58 Topps 278 Burk card with not just one, but two different print variations. I have not found a single card with both variations though. The two cards pictured on the left (courtesy of DC), show a red print spot on the lower edge of the card's image. With a quick glance, I found only 3 copies with this red print spot between COMC, DC, & ebay. The second variation on this card is the red factory mark on the left edge....it is much more plentiful than the red print spot. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Different sheets, the Pryor and the Bair are on the top row of the A* sheet, the Stanley and the Wathan are on the top row of the E* sheet, the Poquette, Braun, and Washington are on the top row of the F* sheet.
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Saved---nice find on the Burk.
Cliff--interesting on the Bair. The Pryor can also be found with white of yellow position ![]() Last edited by ALR-bishop; 11-20-2014 at 11:39 AM. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thank you Cliff and Al...
Here is another print variation I found buried in my collection today(it has been previously documented as lipstick on the shoulder), but I had never seen it before. I guess Gil and Mossi have similiar tastes in women?? Last edited by savedfrommyspokes; 11-20-2014 at 12:29 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1966 Topps High # Print Variations | 4reals | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 04-27-2014 06:05 PM |
Are these variations or print defects? | savedfrommyspokes | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 16 | 02-09-2013 11:52 AM |
Well known print defects. Do variations exist without? | novakjr | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 01-28-2011 04:32 PM |
Finally confirmed - d311 print variations exist! ("bluegrass" variations) | shammus | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 09-03-2010 07:58 PM |
Wanted: T206 Print Variations and Errors | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 01-04-2007 07:23 PM |