 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
11-16-2014, 06:05 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Reagarding the Spahn Bowman cards.... wow - that is absolutely ridiculous... my only guess is that the submitter must have been a "Preferred PSA" submitter/customer....
__________________
fr3d c0wl3s - always looking for OJs and other 19th century stuff. PM or email me if you have something cool you're looking to find a new home for. 
|
|
#2
11-17-2014, 03:52 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Spahn
is terrible, looks to be an early grade from serial number. And some of you guys were talking about how good Baker was yesterday? I see a lot of junk in the early serial numbers. Just like many of the Merkle SGC graded cards are not up to the standards of the company after Dave bought it.
|
|
#3
11-17-2014, 11:25 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Do you think PSA would "make good" on the difference between the PSA8 price and PSA Authentic price for the owner of this card? My guess is that they'd "stand firm" on their initial assesment and that it was cut that way from the factory..... hahahaha...
__________________
fr3d c0wl3s - always looking for OJs and other 19th century stuff. PM or email me if you have something cool you're looking to find a new home for. Last edited by Fred; 11-17-2014 at 11:26 AM.
|
|
#4
11-17-2014, 12:12 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
So what's the deal with this card? Is it just an oversight, or did the submitter opt for no qualifiers (meaning it would have been a PSA 5 (MC) otherwise)?
__________________
ThatT206Life.com
|
|
#5
11-17-2014, 12:47 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
