![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I find the Pop reports for SGC & PSA to be pretty accurate for T210, T211, and T213-1's. I have done a lot of research on these 3 groups and other than a little ambiguity from the sites, patterns can be discerned allowing you to understand scarcity and the like.
As for T206, I wouldn't touch that as it is out of my scope of collecting and honestly the information provided is probably better than having no information, so it does help to some degree depending on what you collect.
__________________
Collector of Nashville & Southern Memorabilia |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Best to all, Larry |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is the SMR accurate? | Matthew H | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 06-01-2010 07:55 PM |
How accurate are population reports? | wolterse | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 05-14-2010 06:48 AM |
How accurate is the PSA Registry? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 02-24-2008 06:06 PM |
PSA vs. SGC - consistent and accurate? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 45 | 02-09-2006 07:14 AM |
Accurate Vintage Stats: where to go? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 11-12-2003 04:20 PM |