 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Which Card Has The MC Qualifier | |||
| 1958 Topps |
   
|
6 | 7.06% |
| 1969 Topps |
  
|
70 | 82.35% |
| None |
  
|
5 | 5.88% |
| Both |
  
|
4 | 4.71% |
| Voters: 85. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
11-08-2014, 01:44 PM
|
||||
|
||||
69 - MC it is miscut as it is a diamond cut
58 - OC it is Off Centered but the borders are still straight
__________________
https://www.flickr.com/photos/bn2cardz/albums 
|
|
#2
11-08-2014, 01:50 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Never too late to learn something new but what is meant by a diamond cut?
I also agree that that the card is over graded but the qualifier brings it down a notch or two.
|
|
#4
11-08-2014, 02:00 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Can we see the backs?
The MC could very easily be on the back of the card. From the looks of the front both should only be oc. A tilted photo on a square card does not generally get MC but a card without a square cut may. MC is usually reserved for cards worse than 99-1 centering. Edited: Now that scans are added the 1969 is clearly mc.
Last edited by glynparson; 11-09-2014 at 09:45 AM.
|
|
#5
11-08-2014, 02:08 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
The MC designation seems to be given out very arbitrarily. This one is just o/c a bit top-to-bottom.
__________________
ThatT206Life.com
|
|
#6
11-08-2014, 02:11 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Just included the backs.
|
|
#7
11-08-2014, 02:13 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
The back makes it more clear. If the cut goes into the print at all it is Miscut. This applies to the Lajoie as well.
__________________
https://www.flickr.com/photos/bn2cardz/albums
|
|
#8
11-08-2014, 02:16 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ah, ok. That makes sense. The comma on mine may touch the bottom edge.
__________________
ThatT206Life.com
|
|
#9
11-08-2014, 07:07 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ok, who is going to fess up to selecting BOTH or NONE in the poll?
__________________
fr3d c0wl3s - always looking for OJs and other 19th century stuff. PM or email me if you have something cool you're looking to find a new home for. Last edited by Fred; 11-08-2014 at 07:07 PM.
|
|
#10
11-08-2014, 07:12 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Id say the 69 is mis cut, as the back shows , to me anyway asbits miscut
__________________
Successful transactions with: Drumback, Mart8081, Obcmac, Tonyo, markf31, gnaz01, rainier2004, EASE, Bobsbats, Craig M, TistaT202, Seiklis, Kenny Cole, T's please, Vic, marcdelpercio, poorlydrawncat, brianp-beme, mybuddyinc, Glchen, chernieto , old-baseball , Donscards, Centauri, AddieJoss, T2069bk,206fix, joe v, smokelessjoe, eggoman, botn, canjond Looking for T205's or anything Babe Ruth...email or PM me if you have any to sell.
|
|
#11
11-08-2014, 06:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PSA (OC) qualifiers | jboosted92 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 07-19-2009 11:06 PM |
| PSA (OC) qualifiers | jboosted92 | Live Auctions - Only 2-3 open, per member, at once. | 1 | 07-17-2009 03:05 PM |
| PSA & Qualifiers...They're the only ones... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 07-10-2007 07:40 PM |
| What are all the qualifiers | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 06-12-2005 04:40 PM |
| PSA 1 Qualifiers | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 05-01-2005 09:41 AM |
Hybrid Mode
