![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Moi? I only know the hobby's great guys.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Well, you know me and it's true, I don't collect high grade 33 Goudeys anymore.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets Last edited by calvindog; 11-04-2014 at 04:41 PM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm with Jeff on this one. IMHO, the population of true "8's" and "9's" is going to be very, very small, with perhaps some exceptions, such as 1915 Cracker Jack (available from the factory without first having been packaged in the product), but it will still appear to grow as the card alteration artists' methods continue to evolve. Their NMT-MT and better creations have and will continue to escape attention by the graders in a significant number of cases. I like to stick with significant cards (HOF'ers, and best of all, their rookie cards, when possible) that are rare in any grade. To me, eye appeal triumphs over technical grade insofar as really rare cards are concerned. My two cents!
Highest regards, Larry Last edited by ls7plus; 11-04-2014 at 07:12 PM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm wondering how those who claim widespread altering actually know this based on evidence not suspicion?
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Because I've spoken to people who alter 1933 Goudeys.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
With anything worth real money altering happens. I'm not sure about the widespread part, but with under 300 9s between PSA and SGC even 4 or 5 might be enough to call it widespread.
Yet another reason to reverse the tiers for grading. Rush the 88 Donruss cards, spend a bit more time on the expensive stuff so you've got time to really take a good look. A really great faker will still get stuff past them, but spending more than a few seconds before they rush to slab it and get it out the door in a certain number of days would let them catch more. Steve B |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
But Jeff, this is from our very own forum.
http://net54baseball.com/forum/content/goudey.html For the most part, Goudey cards (including the 1933 Sport Kings) were all cut the same way between 1933 and 1938, and therefore trimming detection is fairly straightforward.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Highest regards, Larry Last edited by ls7plus; 11-06-2014 at 05:47 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
For sale 1933-35 goudey (hof) ungraded liquidation | tolstoi | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 9 | 11-16-2014 12:39 PM |
1935 Goudey Ungraded | tolstoi | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 02-14-2014 11:37 AM |
wtb to complete sets 1933 goudey 36 diamond stars, 35 goudey, 36 goudey, 41 goudey | asw37 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 12 | 10-04-2013 04:50 PM |
WTB: Ungraded 33/34/35 Goudey | JonDailey1982 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 01-14-2010 04:57 PM |
More 1933 Goudey Ungraded | jabiloxi | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 11-21-2009 08:13 PM |