![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My posted statement: all backs are clean and equal. If they were not I would has taken the time to assemble and scan them also.
Eric - Glyn Your opinion is that the Johnson card is one grade higher than any of the rest? Johnson has less wear than Ganley? Henry Simply judge from the image provided. You may have a favorite grader; I don't. I judge each graded card on its' own merit. We are not debating your favorite ball team we are discussing business. Professional grading is a business. Integrity, honesty, consistency, reliability, fairness, etc., without favoritism business. Making a product with false value is not good business. IMO the one grade higher is not warranted. Bias = submitter. You do realize that at the same grade the Johnson card is worth at about 20 times more than any of the other cards and with one extra grade point about 30 times. That difference is a few thousand dollars. Someday we will have computer grading that will be free of any influences or "errors". Dennis The image is twice the size of the postcard!! Larger than given anywhere. Bob Exactly, and the better player - the higher card value. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Card grading ?'s | GrayGhost | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 12-04-2014 09:49 AM |
Card Grading vs. Autograph Grading | scooter729 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 08-20-2014 12:52 PM |
When will Grading Card Co.'s Consider.. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 09-10-2007 09:51 AM |
see, now this is why you do need card grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 06-29-2005 04:24 PM |
Card grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 08-21-2002 08:58 PM |