![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lordstan--
Please let me correct your phrase--I believe you meant to say how can I prove the players in my photo are those players. When I sent copies of my photo I used phrase "my interpretation" ( Interpretation= to conceive in the light of a individual belief, judgment.) --------I am just thrilled the photo has enough merit for any article. ( Even when it will be bad ) If everyone believes there is no possibility, that's the way it will be. If a just few believe there is a possibility, that's the way it will be. Last edited by Directly; 10-01-2014 at 08:50 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I said exactly what I meant. You not only have no proof that the names you have assigned are correct, you have no proof that all the players in the picture are even on the same team. The players are wearing at least 3 or 4 different uniforms. All of your identifications go out the window because your entire theory is based upon the idea that this is one team. It clearly isn't.
__________________
My signed 1934 Goudey set(in progress). https://flic.kr/s/aHsjFuyogy Other interests/sets/collectibles. https://www.flickr.com/photos/96571220@N08/albums My for sale or trade photobucket album https://flic.kr/s/aHsk7c1SRL |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
So Per your set in stone theory since these players are not wearing the same uniforms they are not on the same team?-!!-I believe they could be! If you believe you might know who these players are, I believe I might know who my players are! Last edited by Directly; 01-27-2024 at 06:17 AM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I guess Scott was right. I never said I was an expert, but I can obviously do things that you cannot, like see ear shapes and facial shapes. I can also learn new things. For instance, when someone who is widely accepted in our hobby as an expert in facial comparison and identification, like Mark(Bmarlowe1) is, I tend to pay attention and listen. You obviously refuse to listen and use just about any excuse possible to try and negate his, and everyone else who has ever opined on the photo, opinion because his conclusions don't fit with your agenda. You can keep on living in your fantasy world where just because you think you're right, logic and reason are rejected. Congrats on your photo of some random group of players that have absolutely nothing to do with Charles Comiskey. Using your logic, I see we can finally agree on something. I don't know who the players in this last photo you posted are, and you don't know who the players in your photo are.
__________________
My signed 1934 Goudey set(in progress). https://flic.kr/s/aHsjFuyogy Other interests/sets/collectibles. https://www.flickr.com/photos/96571220@N08/albums My for sale or trade photobucket album https://flic.kr/s/aHsk7c1SRL |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm going to take the liberty of applying the above statement to everything I've ever posted here....thank you.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Here's a vote to change this site to "ScottIsRight.com"!
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Even I would never claim that I was always right. But I've come to realize that the consensus is that when I AM right, I can be kind of pompous about it.
The only thing worse than that is being wrong and being pompous about it, which I think we are getting an overdose of in this thread.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That's funny - you've finally posted a photo that actually does include Radbourn. It's a very well-known combined 1886 Bos NL / NY NL photo.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Using the time-honored skills of facial-mustache recognition, it's plain to see that this photo doesn't just "include Radbourn." It includes 16 Radbourns!! (The guy in the top hat is Radbourn's twin brother.) My goodness, can't you see that! This is actually a well-known example of the first use of photoshop. Ken |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Now I am no expert but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express once. ![]() ![]() ![]() |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
This is pretty easy, the only guy in the t206 set with a mustache is titus. So every player in the picture with a stache must be titus. not sure on the clean shaven guys though. Last edited by Econteachert205; 10-02-2014 at 07:35 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hiding in Plain Sight | JollyElm | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 15 | 01-05-2014 11:49 AM |
Topps is just plain strange. | steve B | Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present) | 2 | 03-20-2013 08:09 AM |
At the first pole ...... its REA's T210 Jackson by a nose at | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 04-11-2006 06:05 PM |
Pete needs to wipe his nose better | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 08-22-2004 09:30 PM |
Sometimes ebay sellers are just plain dumb | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 04-10-2003 04:12 PM |