![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Check out this thread I started a while back… http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=185244
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dick Gilkeson noted the line differences on the Williams card and several other cards in the 56 set in his variations publication some time back, 85 to 95 . And with ebay, the number of known cards with these lines has proliferated. I wonder if you looked long enough whether you could find them on all cards in the set.
I have a couple of examples in my set but Darren's prior thread convinced me it would drive me crazy trying to run down all the possible differences on just the Williams, let alone all the other cards in the set ![]() Here are other 56 odditiies ![]() ![]() Last edited by ALR-bishop; 09-18-2014 at 09:15 AM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd think most of the 56s would have the line differences. The Wiliams was in Nozakis book, along with maybe one or two others.
One of the good things about Ebay is that to some degree it lets us look at far more cards than we could have in the early 80's. A big collection might have a lot of cards, but hardly anyone went through them looking for little differences. And after a point dealer didn't keep them in stock by the boxful. Steve B |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
with or without white "arm band". The white band is the scarcer of the two, but is not hard to find
![]() Last edited by ALR-bishop; 09-23-2014 at 10:32 AM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
How did I miss this one on eBay? Did anyone here win it? It's the first 1974 that I have seen with this printing flaw, similar to the 1990 Topps Frank Thomas No Name.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I saw this card posted in another forum....has anyone ever seen a 69 Topps card like this with a grey back? Any ideas on how this card ended up with a grey back?
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have seen 2 other Mathews cards with this defect
![]() Last edited by ALR-bishop; 11-03-2014 at 08:26 AM. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That's great, Cliff! Probably means there's a couple different cards from the same sheet with that same characteristic.
__________________
COLLECTING BROOKLYN DODGERS & SUPERBAS |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Enjoyed reading this thread .
Here's one I pulled ..... ![]() Ken |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Here is a HOF print variation...72 #300 Aaron, found only a few copies with the print line across his legs. This line is much more obvious in hand versus the images from DC. This line would be similar to red line that appears on some copies of the 306 Boswell card.
Last edited by savedfrommyspokes; 02-24-2015 at 09:03 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1966 Topps High # Print Variations | 4reals | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 04-27-2014 06:05 PM |
Are these variations or print defects? | savedfrommyspokes | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 16 | 02-09-2013 11:52 AM |
Well known print defects. Do variations exist without? | novakjr | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 01-28-2011 04:32 PM |
Finally confirmed - d311 print variations exist! ("bluegrass" variations) | shammus | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 09-03-2010 07:58 PM |
Wanted: T206 Print Variations and Errors | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 01-04-2007 07:23 PM |