![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Count me in for 2 spots.
Spots 71 & 218 please. Thanks
__________________
Scot Successful Transactions: t206hound, LukeLyon, Sebie43, Bocabirdman, tuckr1, Jimivintage, shorttmail66, jcc6252 Last edited by Roofman4; 09-16-2014 at 12:04 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'll take 2- 29 if available and a random spot (or 2 if 29 is gone)
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I will take 2 random spots.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'll take spot 24 and 85. If not there I'll take 2 random
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'll take 249 and 250 or random if unavailable
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'll take 66 and 98 if available. thanks
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
sounds fun! Please put me in for two spots as well!
I want #17 and you can do a random number for my second one! Thanks! Derek
__________________
... http://imageevent.com/derekgranger Working on the following: HOF "Earliest" Collection (Ideal - Indiv): 250/346 (72.3%) 1914 T330-2 Piedmont Art Stamps......: 116/119 (97.5%) Completed: 1911 T332 Helmar Stamps (180/180) 1923 V100 Willard's Chocolate (180/180) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I will take two random spots.
Thanks, Mark |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I will take two random spots please.
thanks, Tony |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Now just anxiously awaiting the announcement of the date and time for the break.
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
$ sent for spot 89 & 202. I'll take the Aaron and Banks, thanks.
![]() |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If I received the two cards which corresponded to the numbers I was assigned it would be HOF Heinie Manush (you know no one is called Heinie anymore) as a coach and 1960 Cy Young award winner Vern Law.
I could live with that Rich |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
2 Spots. Random. Thanks.
|
#14
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
![]() Quote:
Once he knew the set was coming in Tuesday, he should have immediately posted a time for the sign up sheet. If it had been Thursday, or Friday, or Saturday when more people would be off from work, and thereby able to participate in the sign up, nobody would have had a problem. If it were me, I'd have posted "the set is coming in today. Finalized instruction and/or rules will be posted for public consumption tomorrow at 5 pm. The signup sheet will be posted at 2pm Saturday, eastern time. 1 slot per person until either all the slots are filled, or until all the interested parties have had a chance to get their one slot. If there are remaining slots, we will hold until 3 pm to make sure that any stragglers have had their opportunity to get in, and then take offers for additional slots. One additional slot maximum in this second round." Easy. No interpretation necessary. Instructions a child could understand. But that didn't happen. We were told that a thread with the finalized instructions would be posted Tuesday: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The only area where I understand there being any confusion was the number of people signing up. As a group break had not been done on Net 54 before (to my knowledge), there is no way you could have ultimately known how many people would be buying spots. But in that circumstance, it would have been prudent to start with one slot maximum per person, making sure that everybody who wanted to participate had the opportunity to do so, up to 250 people. If there were slots left over, selling those additional slots wouldn't have taken long at all. The 250 slots didn't need to be filled on Tuesday. What harm would there have been if an additional day were required to fill the slots? None. But by allowing people to sign up for two slots, a whole lot of people now do not get to participate. And quite frankly, why the people who had stated definitely they were in had to sign a second shot is puzzling to me. You had early indications of not interest, but commitment. The sign up sheet should have been for 250 - the number of people who had already committed to buy. When the discussion was begun, you didn't know for sure if that kind of group break were possible, if there would be enough enthusiasm for it. Those people who signed on early made this possible, and many of them got nothing to show for it. I know you are saying this was a learning experience, and a lot of these edges will be smoothed out in future breaks. But there didn't have to be any rough edges at all. The only variable should have been the number of slots that you could fill, and that was only a matter of letting the sheet stay up one day or two. Everything else should have been straight forward. You missed the point. Congrats. If you don't know why somebody is upset, Frank, it's best not to say anything at all. Because quite honestly, belittling me is uncalled for, and it is not appreciated.
__________________
Building these sets: T206, 1953 Bowman Color, 1975 Topps. Great transactions with: piedmont150, Cardboard Junkie, z28jd, t206blogcom, tinkertoeverstochance, trobba, Texxxx, marcdelpercio, t206hound, zachs, tolstoi, IronHorse 2130, AndyG09, BBT206, jtschantz, lug-nut, leaflover, Abravefan11, mpemulis, btcarfagno, BlueSky, and Frankbmd. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Net54baseball Pre-War Set Group Break - Set to be Decided? | Leon | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 145 | 09-16-2014 11:56 AM |
Vintage Set Group Break Idea! Input Needed! | autocentral | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 146 | 08-06-2014 08:27 PM |
F/S 1954 Topps Group of (46) Different - All SGC Graded | old-baseball | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 12-26-2011 04:05 PM |
1954 Topps set break-ends 11/27-11/28! | LEIDEMEG | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 2 | 11-28-2010 05:39 PM |
1954 Topps Set Break | LEIDEMEG | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 11-28-2010 05:38 PM |