Which Vintage series looks the most beautiful in your eyes?

[chernieto]

T3' are great, but blemishes can be hard to miss.
T202 have alot going for them.....3 in 1
A GREAT BATSMAN T202 Front.jpg

[GregMitch34]

Morgan Red Belts are up there, due to hand-tinting.

http://www.net54baseball.com/attachm...1&d=1409589955

[refz]

Prewar: Cracker Jacks
Postwar: 1956 Topps

[steve_a]

Originally Posted by chernieto

T3' are great, but blemishes can be hard to miss.
T202 have alot going for them.....3 in 1
Attachment 159103

+1

[GasHouseGang]

T3's are stunning, but don't seem like cards. I love the N162's like so many other's have mentioned.

[vthobby]

1948 Bowman Basketball (but I have my own selfish reason for that)

Peace, Mik

[bobbvc]

Though a little large, these get less love than they deserve. Beautiful thin stock "cards".

[vthobby]

Ted,

That is very rare. It is the first one I have seen with a Kubiak attached to the lower right corner. Usually the Kubiak/Miller combo comes with the Kubiak on the lower left!

Peace, Mik

[sb1]

In my opinion

[Vintagecatcher]

For standard size cards...my choice is the E101 set. Tough to beat the colors in the sunsets in this set.

Patrick

[Tao_Moko]

Agree with most but think that T212 deserves a nod

[itjclarke]

Originally Posted by chernieto

T3' are great, but blemishes can be hard to miss.
T202 have alot going for them.....3 in 1
Attachment 159103

I gotta give a shout out to T202 as well. For pure aesthetics, I vote N162, but T202 are a total package- art/portrait/early action shots and a bunch of fun info on the back to boot.

T202 Cobb Jennings HA.jpg
T202 Mordecai Brown.jpg
T202 Mathewson Devlin Too Late for Devlin.jpg
Attachment 159167
T202 Speaker Wood rounding third.jpg

Also love- Goudeys/Diamond Stars, T206, T212, E93/E95, and many more. I'm in the minority and am not too in to T3. Definitely beautiful, but they just don't do it for me... yet

[steve B]

I really can't decide. It's also one of the few areas where my likes are "normal"

N162s are nice, and usually look nice even when they're a bit beat up.
But I don't have any yet they just seem expensive.

T3s are very nice, some of the poses look really odd though.
And a really beat T3 doesn't look anywhere near nice.

I'm partial to T204 also, have one sorta ok one. Another set that's fairly expensive especially for nice ones.

If only someone had done a set with N162 style art T3 size and with a T204 style border.

The other sets I'm partial to probably won't get any votes beyond mine.
Mp company
41 Goudey

Steve B

[Northviewcats]

...for color and variety Obaks deserve consideration.

Best regards,

Joe

[The Nasty Nati]

My votes: T3, T206, T202, and 1951 Bowman.

[T206Collector]

[E93]

Two of my favs from the 19th and early 20th centuries
JimB