T210 Oddity?

[mrvster]

looks like you have a rare scrap there....dan m has the om sideways mc....

that will be a big card...id have to see it....but card appears to "taper"....measure the dimensions if you can for inconsistency.....


if you can get that between $500- $1000 I think you did well...

but the market will have to stay strong on this series

[John V]

The taper may be due to the angle of my photo. I was trying to avoid glare. I ended up with blur instead.

[mrvster]

may not be scrap, but def. rare! dan McKee would give you a little more accurate $ amount on this...

id still stick between $500 and $700 if not scrap.....wrong back.....upside down.....miscut...

if this was a T206, it would be like hitting a mini lottery......

[DixieBaseball]

Double Post

[DixieBaseball]

Originally Posted by mrvster

may not be scrap, but def. rare! dan McKee would give you a little more accurate $ amount on this...

id still stick between $500 and $700 if not scrap.....wrong back.....upside down.....miscut...

if this was a T206, it would be like hitting a mini lottery......

I suspect the T206 goes for more money because there are more T206 collectors !? It can't be that T206 is more rare than T210... With all the scrap, blank, and miscut backs found in T206, one would think that a card where there is only 3 known to exist, would demand much more?

So, let me ask the T206 guys this... Do we have many documented T206 players that are found only in Piedmont 150, but an example of the same player exist in Piedmont 350? (May be a bad example, but I want to ascertain the rarity of a T206 with the wrong series back. This one has the wrong series and being the 2nd card from series 8 found with a series 3 back, it has to be a part of the "wrong sheet" printing effects or scrap as you said...

[wonkaticket]

I'd pay well above 100-200 I would say that's on the lower side....I'd be a buyer well above $500 or even more. It's quite scarce and a neat little item congrats.

[mrvster]

you are absolutely correct.....t210 has just not been recognized yet....or may never get the respect T206 get....this card is of the "scrap" order, just can't determine it by the scan/ needs measurements....as you said, this is a very rare card, just there aren't enuf t210 collectors out there....

I'm not an expert on T210, but I believe my estimate falls within the "range" of such an error! and the market out there on these...

if this were a T206, this could be a 20 k + card easy I believe....

(wrong back/ uppy/ miscut) scrap??

[steve B]

Originally Posted by DixieBaseball

I suspect the T206 goes for more money because there are more T206 collectors !? It can't be that T206 is more rare than T210... With all the scrap, blank, and miscut backs found in T206, one would think that a card where there is only 3 known to exist, would demand much more?

So, let me ask the T206 guys this... Do we have many documented T206 players that are found only in Piedmont 150, but an example of the same player exist in Piedmont 350? (May be a bad example, but I want to ascertain the rarity of a T206 with the wrong series back. This one has the wrong series and being the 2nd card from series 8 found with a series 3 back, it has to be a part of the "wrong sheet" printing effects or scrap as you said...

Yes, T206 major errors go for more because there's more demand.

And I believe the answer to both the second and third questions is YES! Schulte front view was a 150 only until a couple years ago when a single Piedmont 350 was found.
I'd posted a thread about the possibility of wrong backs in T206 not much before it was discovered.
I Consider it to be a wrong back. There should be others, I occasionally look for cards with differences between series where there might be a front that's usually a 150 but with a 350 back. Or 350 with 350/460.

If someone is tracking errors on T210, they can add this one.



Not a great scan, but roughly half of the glosscoat didn't get printed.

Steve B

[mrvster]

as for the Schulte + 1....but not sure if it fits into the short printed piedy 350's catagory???....lundgren, lindy, ewing....ect...ect....

[steve B]

I haven't checked them all, Lundgren might be. Lindaman and Ewing both come with EP , so probably just massively shortprinted.

But they might be. That still needs study to find a 150/350 difference. If there isn't one it becomes a question of carryover vs wrong back. Which is a topic for another thread. We've already strayed too far.


To get back on track, any other T210 oddities? Another missing gloss?

Steve B