![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I agree that it makes sense that the factory number would be printed in the center of the sheet, but that doesn't mean that the cards would be. It could be that the cards were aligned to the left and there was more space on the right;i.e-not enough to print a card. I'm sure Steve can give us more insight.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Nice facts and speculation
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
your analytical mind is what we need!
![]() makes a lot of sense..... I like the Plank replacement theory ![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Topics for discussion re: t206 Printing and errors | Clark7781 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 04-17-2012 09:38 PM |
T206 Backs Discussion, Part 215,256,559 | usernamealreadytaken | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 04-16-2010 07:31 PM |
E cards - what size sheet to store raw? | tiger8mush | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 04-16-2010 12:46 PM |
T206 Printing Discussion | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 11-21-2007 06:01 AM |
For Discussion: Relative Values of T206 and T205 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 06-02-2006 09:57 AM |