![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I know absolutely zilch about the printing process, but I have also have seen/own Diamond Stars with similiar horizontal print lines that come from the semi-high numbers (#85-96). I haven't noticed (and haven't really been looking) for examples in the lower numbers, but if RGold's theory is correct, then it is possible that the following #'s could have print lines, as they all exist in the 1936 print run:
2,4,5,8,9,10,12,16,22,26,30,31, and 73-108 Brian |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mcgraw print defect | martin neal | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 34 | 08-27-2020 08:01 PM |
1932 National Chicle Diamond Kings Premiums? (3-card preview of R327 Diamond Stars) | Spike | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 12-06-2013 05:59 PM |
Card Print Amount Questions | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 01-13-2009 06:14 AM |
Print Process - Diamond Stars | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 05-18-2006 03:04 PM |
1934-36 National Chicle Diamond Stars questions | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 07-02-2002 02:45 PM |