![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Top Loaders ... http://www.bcwsupplies.com/cat/tradi...card-toploader Thanks, ChiSoxFan |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Right now all my raw cards are in soft sleeves inside top loaders and I store them in a box. It would be nice to put them all in a binder but I don't want to lose the protection of the top loader. Last edited by ZachS; 08-07-2014 at 11:15 AM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
When I was building my set I placed the t206's in penny sleeves, then the tobacco card specific top loaders that ultra pro sells, then in the 9 page pocket. They slide around a little bit, but it wasn't bad. I would store the binder standing up because if I had it laying down they had a tendency to slide out. It actually looked really nice! I just couldn't bring my self to store the t206's in the 15 card over because I was afraid they would get bent when stored in the binder.
It's not a bad system, looks great, and you can thumb through the cards pretty easily! You would probably need two binders if you go the 9 card page route for a complete t206 set. Jeff |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Tackling the Monster T206 = 213/524 HOFs = 13/76 SLers = 33/48 Horizontals = 6/6 ALWAYS looking for T206 with back damage. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Came across this thread on a google search...it's been awhile, wanted to check and see if anyone has a good suggestion on binder storage of their t206's? I've used both the 15 and 20 card pages. My vote is the 20. I like the way the page is completely filled out with cards and fewer pages are needed. Plus getting cards in and out is much easier than the 15 card pages... the huge drawback is the top row seems to fall a little short (at least with the BCW brand) leaving a small top portion of the cards exposed.
Are there any suggestions for binder storage/page brands that folks think they've nailed it and can share??? A side note, I put 520 together in 2008 and my method was trimming semi-rigid holders along the top and one side, so they would fit in the standard 9-card pages...made for a thick heavy binder, but it all fit in one binder and I felt like the cards were well protected. Not a horrible option, but I'm all in on 20 per page vs 15 or 9. -Ryan |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I settled on 15 pocket pages in Lighthouse binders. happy with that choice. I also bought stamp tongs to help slide cards in/out without damaging them
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yeah, I came across a guy who had about 70-80 t206's for sale on 'offer-up' of all places. I was skeptical...but they were legit (bunch of HOFers, some SLers, even an Elite 12 in the mix), he had them stored in the 15-card pages. I was actually using a q-tip along the back of some cards to help slide them out, so good to know on the stamp tongs.
I'm curios if anyone knows of 20 card pages that might fit a little better than the BCW, yet still provide archival safe, acid free, etc.. Included some pics of the collection I came up on... |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Anyone Here Win t206 Lot of 8 Glued on Binder Page? | jlehma13 | T206 cards B/S/T | 0 | 06-20-2014 07:24 PM |
Graded cards stored in binder with 4 pocket page | g_vezina_c55 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 11-14-2013 08:09 PM |
Question for Bobby Binder re: VCP | barrysloate | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 45 | 10-17-2009 06:20 PM |
Question for Mr. Binder | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 131 | 05-01-2007 11:35 PM |
question on photos binder | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 03-13-2003 02:50 PM |