![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Been reading, and re-reading, this thread with interest. First let me say I am not generally a baseball collector and I have never owned a '58 Aaron, so I cannot comment on other peoples card that they have in their hands and can see better than I.
Having said that, I am generally a skeptic, and here is why. Doing some general research on printing, I have found out that this type of printing is referred to as CMYK printing (C=cyan, M=magenta, Y=yellow, and K="key" or black). It is my understanding that printing is generally done in the order of the initials. In otherwords, a sheet is printed with cyan first, Magenta second, yellow third and finally black. There are a couple ways I could see a sheet getting through without the yellow being printed. 1 - The press ran out of yellow ink. 2 - An operator removed the sheet after the magenta printing, skipped the yellow and put it back on the press before the black (not likely in my mind). 3 - 2 consecutive sheets could have got stuck together after printing the cyan and magenta. If stuck together, the top sheet would recieve the yellow, but not the bottom sheet. This sort of thing happens, I'm sure, however it doesn't seem likely that the sheets would separate after the yellow and each make it through the black process. I would think if the sheets got stuck together, the bottom sheet would miss the yellow and the black. Regardless if any of these happens, the fact remains that the entire sheet would be missing the yellow. Here is a picture I found on the internet, of a partial(?) uncut sheet of 77, 1958 Topps baseball cards, that includes the Aaron card. [IMG] ![]() If a single sheet, assuming a sheet only consisted of these 77 cards, made it through without the yellow, then not only would there be a blue Aaron card, but the 32 cards shown that have a yellow background, would in fact be white. This would include Ted Williams, Duke Snider and Don Drysdale. My own opinion is that most are sun, or light faded, but I don't mean intentionally. I have seen numerous card dealers over the years, both in shops and open-air sellers, who have had the same stock of show case cards for years. Cards that sit in showcases, without being rotated or sold, will, over time, fade from the sun or even fluorescent lights. the Aron card is a key card in the set and would have been more likely to be in a showcase than other "common cards from the set, thus it is more likely to get faded. Does this mean that all are illegitimate? Of course not. Anything is possible with Topps' suspect quality control. Looking at some of the "blue" Aarons I can find on the net, it is obvious to me they are indeed faded. You can still tell the white around the Braves logo has yellow tinge to it, compared to the white border of the card. Just my 2 cents worth.
__________________
-Richard- Building 63 sets (1948-88) - 83.64% complete so far 14 sets/subsets complete (10/2/14). My website for 1963 Topps football color variations - |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for your contribution Richard. Good post
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, thank you Richard.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maybe...
Just maybe... The yellow on some printings of the 1958 sheet that contains the Aaron cardhad a similar issue to the black on some 1990 printings that caused the Frank Thomas no name error. Maybe. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
You're very welcome. I actually never heard of these, but it was fun looking into it.
I remember when the Frank Thomas no name error came out. It was all the rage. But until last night I had no idea how it was caused. It appears a piece of some foreign "material" got trapped between the printing plate and the sheet, causing large portions of several cards to come up minus the black ink. I guess something like this could have happened in the Aaron case as well. Anything is possible with Topps, especially since they were probably not too concerned with what future card collectors thought. However like the Thomas card, there should be at the very least, a few cards surrounding it affected by it as well.
__________________
-Richard- Building 63 sets (1948-88) - 83.64% complete so far 14 sets/subsets complete (10/2/14). My website for 1963 Topps football color variations - |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
These are cards I have picked up over my 7 years working on this set. Any opinions on the square blotches of correct color? Also paid less than $100 for all the blues so don't think they were made this way on purpose but not sure how they came to look like they do.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1958 Topps Hank Aaron - BLUE background?? | scooter729 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 72 | 07-25-2017 12:08 PM |
WTB, 1958 Topps Hank Aaron Yellow | Peter_Spaeth | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 03-13-2014 08:12 AM |
FS: 1958 Topps HANK AARON (White) SGC 3 - SOLD! | bobbyw8469 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 04-09-2011 03:37 PM |
FS: 1958 Topps Hank Aaron SGC 84 --- SOLD | Anthony S. | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 06-01-2009 02:56 PM |
I need a 1958 Topps Hank Aaron (White Letter) | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 04-12-2006 06:14 PM |