![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
as far as what i sold a number of (or was asked for many times if i did not have the items):
T206 Rare Backs and higher condition T5 Pinkertons : Had priced hi still sold a number of them Cracker Jacks: was asked for many times Cabinet Cards in General 1952 Mantle's 1955 Clemente 1960s SP hi #'s: 1966 Grant Jackson, Choo Choo Coleman, Cardinals Rookies, Perranoski, 1967: Shellenback/Willis, Belanger, Hegan, Shaw/Sutherland Hi Grade Hall of fame rookies from both Football ( Especially Starr, Brown, Namath)and Baseball ( especially Seaver, Carew, and Stargell also Rose who is not a hall of famer but certainly is their peer on the field) |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Can someone please tell me why the 1914 Cracker Jacks are suddenly so hot? Yes I know they are much tougher than the 1915s because of the method of distribution but it seems like it is akin to what happened with the 1911 Zeenuts about 6-7 years ago when 5 or 6 collectors were determined to pay whatever price necessary to try and accumulate the set and the prices skyrocketed.
I've owned some 14 CJ's I acquired through the years, they are tough, but I am amazed at the set getting so hot. ![]() |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Er1ck.L. ---D381 seeker http://www.flickr.com/photos/30236659@N04/sets/ |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It makes perfect sense to me... Similar to the phenomenon when Kim Burns came out with the Jack Johnson documentary... All of a sudden anything Jack Johnson increased dramatically in value. The crackerjacks of always been some of the most beautiful cards out there... In addition to them just being crackerjack! I am sure that the recent book stimulated interest as well. Add the handful of aggressive buyers to a thin market and there you have it.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
You have several new set collectors starting from square one and that's in addition to another group that's been in the CJ game for years. Its a serious set, very different than the 1915s.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
supply vs. demand.....
as the demand increases, and the supply decreases.....prices increase |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I understand the increased demand, a lot of which I believe is based on investment potential, but as the supply stays the same I still question why this set has become so hot. In other words I strongly believe you have the same scenario which took place with the '11 Zeenuts, 5 or 6 buyers who were bidding against each other at all costs which resulted in the prices being driven higher and higher. Now that those 5 or 6 guys (and yes I was one) have completed the set or are one or two cards away, the prices have come back down to earth. EXish commons were going for $250+ each and now are back around $40. Tough cards like Fullerton which were going for close to $1000 in EX are now back to about $300 or so. I don't know if the CJ 14s will experience a similar drop but both sets are extremely tough and unless a few elderly collectors of 11Zs on the West Coast decide to part with their collections, that set will be nearly impossible to put together now.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Table and Admission Prices 1st national | bigfanNY | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 07-31-2013 11:35 PM |
National prices? | Leon | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 83 | 08-08-2011 01:49 PM |
Sunday Prices/Deals at the National??? | jg8422 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 08-08-2011 01:00 PM |
S/T 1913 National Game HOF SGC prices lowered again | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 05-27-2007 07:48 PM |
maybe OT: How do vintage card prices compare to coin prices? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 08-25-2005 05:03 PM |