Ruth can do the impossible!

[Nyygameused]

But then this!!!!!! Anyone care to chime in on what's going on here?

[Lordstan]

Someone got a good scan of the original. Printed on old paper and put tape over it to hide the fact that it's new.
Scammers and thieves are creative when trying separate people from their money.

[Nyygameused]

Originally Posted by Lordstan

Someone got a good scan of the original. Printed on old paper and put tape over it to hide the fact that it's new.
Scammers and thieves are creative when trying separate people from their money.

So is the card the original? They appear indistinguishable biased on the sigs alone I'd be very scared if someone found identical paper to the card

[ATP]

Fwiw, the first photo, is on the same goofy looking darker brown paper that I see fake cuts on all the time. My guess is that is the copy, obviously.

[Lordstan]

As someone who has fair non-professional photoshop skills, I can say that I think it would be much easier to erase a white background and print the resulting sig image cleanly on a dark background paper. Erasing the dark background and then printing the resulting sig image on a white background would be pretty hard to do without at least a little brownish artifact.

[Runscott]

Mark - I think you passed the test.

It's also unlikely that PSA would authenticate a photocopy.

[yanks12025]

Originally Posted by Runscott

Mark - I think you passed the test.

It's also unlikely that PSA would authenticate a photocopy.

They have before.