 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
07-02-2014, 12:01 PM
|
||||
|
||||
I could be wrong, but it just seems to me that up to VG-Ex the graders let a lot go in terms of a little dirt or stain on the reverse, but from Ex on up much tougher. I have a couple nice card that are easily "5s" but PSA gave them a 4 due to very slight stains. But they probably would not have docked a slightly weaker card.
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SGC and Back Damage? | timelord | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 07-22-2011 10:41 AM |
| D304 Cobb with back damage on ebay -- back damage not shown | calvindog | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 11-26-2010 05:51 PM |
| Scrapbook damage and grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 08-31-2005 05:31 PM |
| Grading vintage cards with back damage | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 10-04-2004 07:03 PM |
| back damage to a Mayo | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 08-26-2004 07:13 AM |
Hybrid Mode
