![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
They are all going to make a few mistakes for not grading the way we think they should. This one might be a grade high, who knows?
We can leave it to sellers to grade and we get stuff like this. You have to take in the whole auction to fully appreciate his grading standards. http://www.ebay.com/itm/1909-10-T206...item3ce3c37673 .
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Poor guy needs money for a new keyboard. He's missing a few letters.
Steve B |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't see the big issue with this card. Maybe should have been a 3, but pretty close...
Last edited by CMIZ5290; 06-29-2014 at 06:19 PM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I started this thread not to question the grade, but to show something more important. The deal here is that the card isn't a PSA 4 -- it's just being sold as one. It's graded at 3.5, and as Mike Healer noted early on, the seller rounded up, from 3.5 to 4.
I get really mad when a seller intentionally misleads a potential customer. A grade of 8(MC) is not a grade of 8, though some sellers are notorious for advertising them that way. This is no better. Unless you read the card as well as the seller's line about it, you'll overpay. In this case, you'll overpay a lot. Most eveybody on this board knows that. But the world isn't made of savvy buyers. When they're taken advantage of, like this, we'll probably lose somebody who might have enjoyed the hobby. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sorry Bob, thanks for the post....
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Makes sense. I agree bob hopefully it will be corrected if someone notifies him. I do not know seller does anyone on here?
|
![]() |
|
|