 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
06-29-2014, 01:16 PM
|
||||
|
||||
What Glyn said. All the SGC 5s I see with significantly rounded corners bother me more, whether it's consistent with their current standards or not.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions.  My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ 
|
|
#2
06-29-2014, 01:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
06-29-2014, 01:34 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Is Raw any Better?
They are all going to make a few mistakes for not grading the way we think they should. This one might be a grade high, who knows?
We can leave it to sellers to grade and we get stuff like this. You have to take in the whole auction to fully appreciate his grading standards. http://www.ebay.com/itm/1909-10-T206...item3ce3c37673 .
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com
|
|
#6
06-29-2014, 06:09 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
What's happening here?
I started this thread not to question the grade, but to show something more important. The deal here is that the card isn't a PSA 4 -- it's just being sold as one. It's graded at 3.5, and as Mike Healer noted early on, the seller rounded up, from 3.5 to 4.
I get really mad when a seller intentionally misleads a potential customer. A grade of 8(MC) is not a grade of 8, though some sellers are notorious for advertising them that way. This is no better. Unless you read the card as well as the seller's line about it, you'll overpay. In this case, you'll overpay a lot. Most eveybody on this board knows that. But the world isn't made of savvy buyers. When they're taken advantage of, like this, we'll probably lose somebody who might have enjoyed the hobby.
|
|
#8
06-29-2014, 06:40 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ah
Makes sense. I agree bob hopefully it will be corrected if someone notifies him. I do not know seller does anyone on here?
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
