![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey guys I just picked up this Joe D and am just curious if 1. this would be considered a miscut/diamond cut and 2. centered to the point that it really hurts the value and/or grade of the card. In person, the card as a whole looks really nice...but The OCD in me is kinda stuck on the centering
![]() ![]() Last edited by davetruth; 06-20-2014 at 04:31 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The value is what someone will pay for it, so it's tough to say what impact the centering has on that specific example of the card. It's a card that is hard to find with both great centering and great focus, and this one is clearly a well-focused example; centering is not its strong suit. So it all depends on what attributes you prefer, and what attributes future buyers will prefer. If someone seeking a well-registered example in that grade or thereabouts comes across this one, he will likely love it and pay strong. A centering guy won't not pay as much as for a better centered specimen. Then someone seeking both attributes will likely have to be very patient and wind up with a higher graded, more expensive example. I'd say the grade looks fine/accurate.
Last edited by MattyC; 06-20-2014 at 04:37 PM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks Matt! I agree this card is def tough to find w/ the best of both worlds..and I accept the fact that I'd probably have to go to at least a PSA 6 to get there. I got a good deal on this so I'm going to stick with it. The registration is probably the most important thing that I was looking for with this card... I have seen higher graded (7+) examples that I would never want because the focus is so terrible, imho it ruins the card. The centering isn't that bad on this... I guess...lol
Last edited by davetruth; 06-20-2014 at 04:49 PM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doesn't look diamond cut to me...more like the image is just a bit "tilted" but I could be wrong. I love the card personally and am sure you probably got a decent deal on it since the centering is not ideal. I'm a centering guy too but am much more liberal when it comes to certain cards that on the higher end of budget, and for those I look for other attributes long strong corners and image quality. Nice pick-up!
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It's not particularly well centered, but for this issue it has superb focus in my opinion.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The "baggie" bothers me much more than the centering ever would!
__________________
I've learned that I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy it. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks guys.. Honestly in person the card's focus looks even more clear then in the scan. I have seen centering that was much worse, but I wondered if, for example, this would get a qualifier of (OC) if it were re-submitted in a modern PSA slab.
Last edited by davetruth; 06-20-2014 at 05:08 PM. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why would you re-submit it? Just have it re-holdered without the baggie.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OK I didn't know you could do that. Good to know. Thanks!
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Sweet Joe D Dave, I'd take that as upgrade on mine any day!
I'd always prefer good centering, but it's rarely a deal breaker for me if the other traits (especially image clarity, sharp/clean surface, corners and borders, which are more my drivers) make the card attractive as a whole. Just a case by case thing more so than a rule for me. I've seen lots of fuzzy imaged but centered cards command hefty premiums, but I choose a sharp image of the player over uniformity of its framing. Hope you enjoy your DiMaggio. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() Last edited by davetruth; 06-20-2014 at 07:21 PM. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
But I still am wondering does the image being slightly tilted and off center make it a diamond cut?
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Looks D-cut to me.
__________________
I've learned that I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy it. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It doesn't to me, I think the image is just tilted, but I could be wrong.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Looks diamond cut to me too. I think that's what makes the centering look off when actually I think the centering is quite decent from L-R, in a diamond symetrical sort of way. Great card!
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm kinda confused as to what a diamond cut is..I searched the forum and see that some say a diamond cut refers to the actual shape of the cardboard vs. the "tilt" cut which is the picture being tilted on the card. This card appears to be the right "shape" but the pic itself is a little tilted and off center. I'm interested to know how this particular "cut" is generally perceived when considering getting a particular card you really want...some seem to be bothered by it...others not so much...like it is a flaw in a card that doesn't make it an "error" if you will...just a flaw like a wrinkle or crease etc.
Last edited by davetruth; 06-20-2014 at 10:30 PM. |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It's funny how you talk about OCD. Haha!! I, for one, am not bothered at all by that centering (I would call it 'slightly tilted'). And the great focus, as many have already mentioned, makes it especially suh-weet!!!
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Dude I'd prolly find something in a GM MT 10 that would bug me lol Last edited by davetruth; 06-20-2014 at 10:28 PM. |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The only thing about that card that bugs me is that
it's not mine. Couldn't care less about the centering. Bad focus is worse than a a heavy crease to me, but then I'm not interested in graded cards or investments.
__________________
T206-520/524 T205-209/221 T207-68/200 T213-2 -65/185 E90-1 102/120 Topps 1954,1959,1964 Bowman 1954 complete Deals competed with: jb217676, marcdelpercio, dog*dirt, srs1a, KennyCole, ullmandds, RCMcKenzie, edhans, dboneesq, mybuddyinc, nineunder71, uke, T206kid, & more |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Last edited by Gobucsmagic74; 06-21-2014 at 05:52 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Should PSA/SGC have a qualifier for Centering? | Brianruns10 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 8 | 10-22-2011 09:57 AM |
SGC grading on centering | HercDriver | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 07-03-2011 02:18 PM |
Centering | Touch'EmAll | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 30 | 02-26-2011 10:07 AM |
T-B or L-R Centering | mintacular | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 11-13-2010 07:18 AM |
Centering question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 02-04-2004 06:08 AM |