![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
From the small scan it looks okay, but so do a lot of forgeries. If that's the scan the seller gave you, I wouldn't touch it, but I am extra-cautious with Ruth items and wouldn't touch any Ruth cut.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was also concerned about the scan, I did receive a better picture:
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The small 'b' looks like it's been messed with.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Looking at the scans close it looks like the auto just has some lighter and darker areas from pressure I would assume, or the auto is fading over time
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The one thing about pencil autographs is that they don't fade over time, whereas ink can fade, FWIW
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Without commenting on this specific item, I am often wary of pencil signatures.
Unlike ink that makes slowness or slight hesitation obvious, pencil hides a lot of sins.
__________________
Steve Zarelli Space Authentication Zarelli Space Authentication on Facebook Follow me on Twitter My blog: The Collecting Obsession |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I don't like it. And like Scott said, stay away from cuts.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Babe Ruth auto | JoeyF1981 | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 4 | 01-11-2014 01:09 PM |
Babe Ruth Auto Cut 1/1 ft/fs | Trojan4Life | Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present) | 4 | 08-20-2012 02:45 PM |
Babe Ruth Pencil? | DWilliams | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 3 | 03-06-2011 07:22 PM |
Babe Ruth Pen & Pencil Set | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 2 | 05-29-2008 08:03 AM |
Babe Ruth Blue Bird PSA 8 - SOLD | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 11-03-2007 10:18 PM |