![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Read again. I give up. Good luck with your reviews.
![]() ![]() ![]() "It is not an exact science because an older form may be used by a submitter who sends the cards in for grading well after the submission number has been generated."
__________________
Check out my website www.imageevent.com/rgold |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My point is that the "low" flip serial numbers don't seem to line up with others saying there were no 2.5s, 3.5s, 4.5s before 2012....
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It was not others saying, it was me. Those half grades did not exist before mid-2012.
The submission numbers are generated online or they are on the pre-printed submission forms. They might be used at a later date. SGC assigns old unused numbers to submissions for different reasons. That is why dating when cards were graded by using the cert numbers can be useful but not 100% accurate. It's a general rule, an indication, or estimate. ![]() ![]() ![]() You should probably just forget any suggestions I made and just send whatever you were planning on sending. The only reason I responded was because you were getting inaccurate answers to your questions. Sorry I confused you.
__________________
Check out my website www.imageevent.com/rgold |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ron, I found your posts extremely confusing.
![]() ![]()
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Shaddup.
![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
Check out my website www.imageevent.com/rgold |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My small experience in having them look at mid grade cards again was interesting.
I asked in person at a show about two cards I thought were better than the grade, both T206s, one a 40 the other a 50. The 50 had a tiny flake of paperloss on the corner and on the front, less than what's missing on most corner wear. ----It also had a very tiny crease on the left edge that I hadn't seen. That was what put it in the 50 category rather than higher- like maybe a 70 or 80. The 40 turned out to have an erased pencil mark on the back. One that I had never spotted in all the time I've owned it, 30 years + ![]() Neither would have bumped on a paid review. I can't say about the impression the standards are slipping. The standard says a tiny crease/wrinkle is ok up to 70, but I don't recall seeing one. And of all the cards I've had graded only two get a grade I thought was high. Oddly, they are a couple of the more expensive cards I've had done, one I personally think it's a full grade high, the other maybe a bit more. The modern stuff I've graded with them didn't do well, but isn't worth redoing. Steve B Last edited by steve B; 06-19-2014 at 08:30 AM. Reason: fixed error |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
May be reviews. Also many dealers have stacks of the preprinted sgc forms. What Ron said is correct as he stated it as a guide not a rule.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What Are the Chances? | barrysloate | Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk | 12 | 09-23-2012 07:43 AM |
What are the chances? | tlwise12 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 4 | 05-04-2011 12:57 PM |
What are the chances? | tlwise12 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 2 | 03-09-2011 12:23 AM |
Chances | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 1 | 12-13-2008 06:30 PM |
What Are The Chances This Is Even Possible? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 02-14-2008 12:46 PM |