![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
pbspelly - you are absolutely correct. Our instructions our to "sell up". Offer the most expensive product first.
Lance - you are correct in saying that if you go to one clerk you may get different rates than the clerk 3' over will give you. It really is fairly simple, but many of the clerks don't seem to know the rules. When you are adding 21cents postage just mark the envelope as "non-machinable" or "non-standard". Scott - even though something is in an envelope, if it varies in thickness, or if it has something like a pack of gum, or a graded card, it is no longer a flat, because it will not go through the flat sorting machines. It needs to be treated as a parcel, because the parcel sorting machine will handle thicker/uneven envelopes without damaging them. The same thing applies to rigid items, like a photo mailer. An 8x10 photo mailer may seem to be a flat, but since it is rigid it will not go through the flats sorting machine without damage, so it needs be be handled like a parcel and parcel charges apply. There is a cheap, safe way to mail single cards, thanks to a special ruling that was made for Netflix. For single, ungraded cards, I use a 6x8 photo mailer. It is under 1/4" thick with one card and a topload, it is under 6 1/8" high, which keeps it in the letter category, but it is rigid, which makes it non-machinable. The postage is 91 cents. 2 ounce postage of 70 cents and the non-machinable charge of 21 cents. The only downside is you cannot purchase tracking, so you don't want to send an expensive card this way. If the postal clerk hassles you just tell them it is a non-machinable 2 ounce letter. If you have a problem with it, give me the zip code of the Post Office and I will contact them. Good luck! Rick
__________________
Rick McQuillan T213-2 139 down 46 to go. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks Rick. I know, and for me personally, since I've been dealing with USPS' definitions for 12+ years, it's not an issue. My comment was regarding the postal employee's reference to a customer making the "mistake" of thinking that an envelope is actually an envelope.
Quote:
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I just mailed a first class legal size envelope that was about 3/8" thick with documents folded, I expected to pay about double normal rate. Got hit up for the "parcel". I have always asked them to meter them in the past and they would with normal postal rates by weight. I guess no more, it weighed 1.3 ounces but cost $2.32. Will fax or email it for free next time, especially now that you can sign documents via the internet.
Instead of promoting business the postal service is pushing it away. More evidence that government has no idea how to run a business. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Another USPS frustration | almostdone | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 10 | 04-17-2014 09:09 PM |
Usps | T3s | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 02-25-2012 09:44 AM |
USPS theft | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 03-24-2009 03:09 AM |
The USPS is really bad lately | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 27 | 10-24-2005 03:38 PM |
USPS | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 10-24-2005 10:43 AM |