It's 1953..and you have a nickel..

[brett 75]

Ted Page 2-5 please ! Would like to finish the article if possible. Thanks ,Brett

[JollyElm]

Originally Posted by brett 75

Ted Page 2-5 please ! Would like to finish the article if possible. Thanks ,Brett

Haha. I was going to say the same thing!!

[tedzan]

I will post the pages tomorrow.

I appreciate your interest in this.


TED Z

[tedzan]

Page 2





Page 3




TED Z
.

[ALR-bishop]

Thanks for posting the article Ted. I started collecting in 1957 at age 7, so started and stayed with Topps. The 53 Bowman color set is the only Bowman set I have put together. I did it recently, mostly for the Musial who did not make his appearance on Topps cards until 1958. I really like the set. I do have an unopened 1953 Topps pack, but no 53 Bowman pack or wrapper

[KCRfan1]

Thanks for the article Ted, it was a nice morning read for me.

[ALR-bishop]

[tedzan]

I will post the last 2 pages later this afternoon. I have to run out now.

Thanks for your interest......and, if yoiu have any questions, feel free to ask me.



TED Z
.

[the 'stache]

Originally Posted by ALR-bishop

Thanks for posting the article Ted. I started collecting in 1957 at age 7, so started and stayed with Topps. The 53 Bowman color set is the only Bowman set I have put together. I did it recently, mostly for the Musial who did not make his appearance on Topps cards until 1958. I really like the set. I do have an unopened 1953 Topps pack, but no 53 Bowman pack or wrapper

Two of my very favorite cards ever made. God, those are beautiful.

I will have them both before the year ends.

[Lueth2048]

1953 Bowman easily. 1953 Topps is the only large sized Topps set that I don't like. I like the hand drawn 1950-52 Bowman sets, but don't like the hand painted Topps set.

I remember reading the story about the 1953 Bowman's in Baseball Cards Magazine.