![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
That was a d-bag move on the outer's part.
__________________
Tackling the Monster T206 = 213/524 HOFs = 13/76 SLers = 33/48 Horizontals = 6/6 ALWAYS looking for T206 with back damage. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am still confused by this thread. You said in the first post that seller was told by someone that the item was undervalued and the seller backed out of the sale and refunded the money. Later you said the seller had a change of heart and was going to honor the sale. Then you said he backed out again because someone from this site emailed him to tell him what the item was really worth. But he already knew it was worth more from your original post? So why the outrage about the role of an anonymous person possibly from this site. After all you discussed it in an open forum, how could you not reasonably expect it to get back to the seller? I get being upset at the seller but clearly there is something I missed or something unsaid in all of this because I don't get the outrage about the anonymous emailer.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Last edited by yanks12025; 06-09-2014 at 05:42 PM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I understand that. But he said in the original post that the seller was aware that the item was worth more because someone told him separately. So the seller was already aware.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
But he then told the seller that he'd go legal action. So I'm guessing it scared the seller back into doing the deal. But then the person showed him this thread and the seller probably realized that there's nothing the buyer could really do and was bluffing legal action.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Then last night he messages me that someone had contacted him about this thread and refunds my money, end of story. It's really ok. Come to find out the bat had a few issues and even though I got it at a nice price, it wasn't a steal by any means like I thought in the beginning. That's why I can live without it. Like I said, I'm more annoyed at the person who messaged the seller. I'm ready to move on, I was just on fire for a few days, and rightfully so in my opinion. I got bigger fish to fry :-)
__________________
Always Buying game used BATS A portion of my collection on GUA: https://gameusedauthority.com/all-co...member_id=pUnl Last edited by UnVme7; 06-09-2014 at 05:54 PM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Got it. Makes more sense now. Seems unfortunate on the whole.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
In summary
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I am shocked that this do-gooder has not yet revealed himself.
![]()
__________________
Tackling the Monster T206 = 213/524 HOFs = 13/76 SLers = 33/48 Horizontals = 6/6 ALWAYS looking for T206 with back damage. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I kind of remember a thread not very long ago involving a rare back t206... Where the majority of net 54 members seemed to think it was fine for the seller to renege as their buy it now price was too low... How is this any different?
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
It isn't. Then again I thought that was BS.
__________________
Tackling the Monster T206 = 213/524 HOFs = 13/76 SLers = 33/48 Horizontals = 6/6 ALWAYS looking for T206 with back damage. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Oops
Last edited by ullmandds; 06-09-2014 at 08:24 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bad Ebay seller | Pup6913 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 04-23-2012 06:09 AM |
ebay seller | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 04-05-2007 08:27 AM |
ebay seller ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 12-12-2006 03:45 PM |
ebay seller | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 12-02-2005 08:24 PM |
Help with ebay seller | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 39 | 05-02-2004 09:16 PM |