![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Greg,
I don't dispute that you are seeing a trend, but the Joe Wood example is not really supportive of your theory. The CJ Wood pose (both '14 and '15) has always been immensely popular, selling routinely for more than many HOF players. If anything, that card has come down quite significantly from where it used to be. You can find quite a few examples of that '14 card selling for $1000-$1800 in a 3 or 4 in the last several years. Cheers, Blair
__________________
My Collection (in progress) at: http://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/BosoxBlair |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
You're partly right but that last 3 recorded sales for the card averaged a healthy 953-- but last night's was 1440. An it was noting special (fairly off-center). I guess that's my point.
Last edited by GregMitch34; 06-01-2014 at 09:14 PM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
$2040 for a 1914 Cracker Jack of Sallee (that shows him as a righty/same error in 1915 set)?
http://loveofthegameauctions.com/auctionresults.aspx Not bad. Here's mine: |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
D310 tint answers, solutions, theories, challenge | brianp-beme | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 37 | 04-21-2023 04:47 PM |
E96 Rossman "Cleveland"--Any Theories? | sreader3 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 01-22-2014 09:37 PM |
Theories on T206 backs having fewer subjects | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 07-22-2007 10:34 PM |
My theories on the forgeries | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 07-08-2003 06:45 PM |
Weird T206 Card - need theories | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 05-10-2003 12:06 PM |