![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Whats everyone opinion.. Was the Spalding bat factory made that way or done afterwards?
Matt
__________________
Matt Bub13@aol.com Always looking for 40k Kork Grip Bats, Babe Ruth, Honus Wagner, Ty Cobb, Lou Gehrig and Joe Jackson Bats & Gloves http://oldbaseballbats.webs.com/ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does that model appear in a catalogue.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If 1880s is really accurate, it may be hard to find a Catalogue with that image. JD's website has some wonderful old catalogues in its Library archives. Will check to see if they go back that far...
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
if I somehow posted an inappropriate "outing" thread given that it is about a bat in a current auction. On our sister side it is pretty much acceptable to legitimately question and explore a lot listing in a major auction house. I don't own it - don't know who does - have no axe to grind with the seller - not associated with the AH in any way - just trying to learn from them what's gots the know-how.
Looking for thoughts as I want to include a nice example of an early bat with my stuff. I thought this was a good candidate for me as it has a great look and isn't just some run of the mill generic early bat - I feel the Spalding stamping makes it a little more special, giving it an air of legitimacy. It's important to me that my bat be 1880's or earlier. I know little about bats other than what I've gleaned from a couple of my equipment reference books - I will be re-visiting them later today. Curious why the stamping might not be legitimate? Thanks to all who have responded so far. Hope to hear more thoughts. I've learned a good deal here - I've tried to contribute where I can to make it a reciprocal arrangement - looking forward to whatever might be added to this thread as I ponder the acquisition. If it isn't to be THIS bat - likely it will be something similar. Knowledge is power. If you have a beautiful early bat at a price the majority of informed collectors would agree was fair - I suppose I'm listening - unless that too is against the rules - in which case my fingers are in my ears...... ![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
To me 1880s to 1890. Looks orig. To me .typical stamping for the time period. The thing that throws me is the bottle shape
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I also think the stampings look original (perfect, actually). Very well preserved, and apparently never touched up. I also think the bottle shape is legit. There is a very similar bat in the Smithsonian Baseball book. If memory serves, they call it a "Springform" Bat, or something similar.
I also have a similar "Bottle" bat of that same vintage, which I will try to post later tonight. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Sorry for the confusion - the stampings are fine. I was referring to the bottle shape .
Matt
__________________
Matt Bub13@aol.com Always looking for 40k Kork Grip Bats, Babe Ruth, Honus Wagner, Ty Cobb, Lou Gehrig and Joe Jackson Bats & Gloves http://oldbaseballbats.webs.com/ |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1955 Topps Trivia Question - Updated with Question #2 | toppcat | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 01-03-2012 07:51 PM |
SGC grading question (possible dumb question) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-08-2006 12:36 AM |
Player question & a set question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 11-13-2004 06:41 PM |